EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Spectral analysis of instantaneous frequency responses to sinusoidal stimulation in cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units of frogs


Japanese Journal of Physiology 37(6): 1031-1049
Spectral analysis of instantaneous frequency responses to sinusoidal stimulation in cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units of frogs
While applying the Fast Fourier Transform to the instantaneous frequency responses to sinusoidal indentations of the cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units in frogs, we examined quantitatively the dynamic responses of these units. In two kinds of slowly adapting (SA) units, i.e., frog type I and frog type II units, and in rapidly adapting (RA) type I units, the instantaneous frequency responses could be reconstructed by summation of the DC component and the major 3-5 harmonics in the power spectra. In both types of SA units, the fundamental wave was the largest in power of the spectrum, but in the RA units, the 2nd harmonic was the largest. In SA units, the phase of the fundamental wave advanced by 20-55 degrees relative to the sinusoidal stimulation, but the phase of the 2nd harmonic of the RA units advanced by ca. 90 degrees. The magnitude of each component in the power spectra, especially the fundamental wave of the two SA units and the 2nd harmonics of the RA unit, increased with an increase in stimulus amplitude and frequency. The phases of the harmonics in both SA and RA types were fairly constant over varying amplitudes and frequencies of sinusoidal stimulation. The present findings indicate that both the frog type I and type II cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units detect both indentation magnitude and positive velocity, and that the RA type I cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units detect the stimulus velocity.


Accession: 006459428

PMID: 3502653



Related references

Threshold response phase to sinusoidal stimulation of frog cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units. Japanese Journal of Physiology 34(6): 1065-1075, 1984

The effects of manganese on the responsiveness of 2 types of slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units in frogs. Neuroscience Letters (SUPPL 17): S153, 1984

Slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units associated with Merkel cells in frogs and effects of direct currents. Somatosensory & Motor Research 8(1): 87-95, 1991

Differential effects of manganese and magnesium on two types of slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units in frogs. Pfluegers Archiv European Journal of Physiology 406(2): 218-224, 1986

Responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferents to step and sinusoidal skin displacements. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 20(1-2): 1381, 1994

The reflex responses of single motor units in human 1st dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. Journal of Physiology (Cambridge) 303: 351-364, 1980

The reflex responses of single motor units in human first dorsal interosseous muscle following cutaneous afferent stimulation. Journal of Physiology 303: 351-364, 1980

Two-frequency stimulation of a cutaneous mechanoreceptor. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50(2): 475-482, 1971

Mechano-electric transduction in the slowly adapting cutaneous afferent units of frogs. Progress in Brain Research 74: 63-68, 1988

Spectral analysis of cutaneous mechanoreceptor ENG activity recorded from a digital nerve in man. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 21(1-3): 1921, 1995