The effects of changing caries prevalence and diagnostic criteria on clinical caries trials

Glass, R.L.; Peterson, J.K.; Bixler, D.

Caries Research 17(2): 145-151

1983


ISSN/ISBN: 0008-6568
PMID: 6337712
DOI: 10.1159/000260663
Accession: 006661668

Download citation:  
Text
  |  
BibTeX
  |  
RIS

Article/Abstract emailed within 0-6 h
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Abstract
In an area of water fluoridation (1 ppm), a clinical trial was carried out with 2 examiners using 2 commercially available dentifrices containing 0.76% sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP). Regular and supervized use of these dentifrices resulted in significantly (P < 0.01) lower caries increments. Of the 853 subjects completing the study period of 30 mo., 41% were caries free at the outset. This subset experienced new caries (mean annual rate of 1 new decayed and filled surface per 100 surfaces at risk), but no significant treatment effect was observed in these subjects with 0 initial caries prevalence (IDFS). In those subjects with non-zero IDFS, the treatment effect was statistically significant and approached the magnitude (22-34% reduction) observed in nonfluoride areas. Future trials may require larger numbers of subjects if caries prevalence continues to decrease. Preselection of subsets with specified caries prevalence may be necessary in order to reduce the sample size and increase discrimination of treatment effects. Comparisons of findings from 2 independent examiners demonstrate the importance of discriminatory diagnostic standards.