+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The functional morphology of turf forming seaweeds persistence in stressful marine habitats

Ecology (Washington D C) 62(3): 739-750

The functional morphology of turf forming seaweeds persistence in stressful marine habitats

Many seaweeds that occur in physically stressful habitats or habitats subject to moderate herbivory grow as colonial turfs rather than as spatially separated individuals. The turf growth form is energetically expensive (the net production per gram ash free dry mass of turfs being 33-61% lower than that of individuals), but turfs suffer less physiological damage during desiccating low tides and lose less biomass to herbivores. The upper portions of turf-forming species show significantly greater rates of apparent photosynthesis and dark respiration than do the lower portions. This spatial partitioning of photosynthetic activity decreases the energetic cost of the turf arrangement and may allow basal portions to function as persistent resting stages during periods of adverse conditions when uprights cannot be maintained. Turf-forming species are specialized for areas that are subject to moderate grazing pressure and physical stresses. They are dependent upon these factors to prevent their competitive exclusion by more productive, but less resistant, seaweeds. Damage to apical portions causes increased branching that results in a more tightly compacted turf. Algae that regenerate in this way can adjust their growth form in accordance with varying levels of disturbance encountered in different habitats and thus incur the minimal cost consistent with survival in that area. For seaweeds occurring in stressful habitats, selection has favored characteristics that increase persistence in space and time even though these involve considerable losses in competitive ability and productivity.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 006680679

Related references

Differences in the structure and functioning of two communities: Frondose and turf-forming macroalgal dominated habitats. Marine Environmental Research 116: 71-77, 2016

Distribution and dominance of two introduced turf-forming macroalgae on the coast of Tuscany, Italy, northwestern Mediterranean Sea in relation to different habitats and sedimentation. Botanica Marina 44(5): 509-520, September, 2001

Functional morphology of intertidal seaweeds adaptive significance of aggregate vs. solitary forms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 18(3): 295-302, 1984

Augmentative biocontrol in natural marine habitats: persistence, spread and non-target effects of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus. Plos One 8(11): E80365-E80365, 2014

Morphology and marine habitats of two southwestern Caribbean atolls: Albuquerque and Courtown. Atoll Research Bulletin 0(435): 1-33, 1996

Mechanisms of competition between canopy-forming and turf-forming intertidal algae. Algae 17(1): 33-39, March, 2002

Use of 'functional habitats' to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation. Aquatic Conservation 9(1): 159-178, 1999

A comparative study of the morphology and anatomy of the olfactory organs of two marine fishes with different habitats--Trichiuris savala (Cuv. et Val.) and Tetrodon leopardus (Russel). Functional and Developmental Morphology 1(1): 73-76, 1991

Variation of morphology and functional traits of dictyonema glabratum from contrasting habitats in the venezuelan andes. Lichenologist (London) 20(3): 269-278, 1988

Role of functional state of mononuclear phagocyte system and complement in forming of extrahepatic persistence of viruses in children with chronic hepatitis B and D. Pediatriya (Moscow) 0(2): 31-35, 1996