+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells

Journal of Cell Biology 102(1): 200-209
The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells
Antibodies to chicken gizzard myosin, subfragment 1, light chain 20, and light meromyosin were used to visualize myosin in stress fibers of cultured chicken cells. The antibody specificity was tested on purified gizzard proteins and total cell lysates using immunogold silver staining on protein blots. Immunofluorescence of cultured chicken fibroblasts and epithelial cells exhibited a similar staining pattern of antibodies to total myosin, subfragment 1, and light chain 20, whereas the antibodies to light meromyosin showed a substantially different reaction. The electron microscopic distribution of these antibodies was investigated using the indirect and direct immunogold staining method on permeabilized and fixed cells. The indirect approach enabled us to describe the general distribution of myosin in stress fibers. Direct double immunogold labeling, however, provided more detailed information of the orientation of myosin molecules and their localization relative to .alpha.-actinin: .alpha.-actinin, identified with antibodies coupled to 10-nm gold, was concentrated in the dense bodies or electron-dense bands of stress fibers, whereas myosin was confined to the intervening electron-lucid regions. Depending on the antibodies used in combination with .alpha.-actinin, the intervening regions revealed a different staining pattern: antibodies to myosin (reactive with the head portion of nonmuscle myosin) and to light chain 20 (both coupled to 5-nm gold) labeled two opposite bands adjacent to .alpha.-actinin, and antibodies to light meromyosin (coupled to 5-nm gold) labeled a single central zone. Based on these results, we conclude that myosin in stress fibers is organized into bipolar filaments.

Accession: 006719965

PMID: 3510218

DOI: 10.2307/1611756

Download PDF Full Text: The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells

Related references

Cytochalasin b induced cross banding of actin myosin and alpha actinin along stress fibers of cultured endothelial cells. Journal of Cell Biology 101(5 PART 2): 156A, 1985

M-RIP targets myosin phosphatase to stress fibers to regulate myosin light chain phosphorylation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280(52): 42543-42551, 2005

Direct visualization of bipolar myosin filaments in stress fibers of cultured fibroblasts. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton 12(3): 150-156, 1989

A molecular pathway for myosin II recruitment to stress fibers. Current Biology 21(7): 539-550, 2011

Rho-kinase dependent organization of stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured fibroblasts. Genes to Cells 12(5): 623-638, 2007

Role of myosin light chain phosphorylation and micro tubules in the assembly and dissolution of stress fibers in a cultured cell type. Federation Proceedings 43(4): ABSTRACT 3457, 1984

Influence of short-term hydrostatic pressure on organization of stress fibers in cultured chondrocytes. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 13(4): 495-502, 1995

Organization of stress fibers in cultured fibroblasts after extraction of actin with bovine brain gelsolin-like protein. Experimental Cell Research 173(1): 244-255, 1987

Investigation of in vitro cultured cells from smooth muscular organs 5. immuno histochemical experiments for demonstration of myosin and estimation of changes in the myosin content in the aorta and in isolated cultured aortic cells of new born rats. Acta Histochemica 67(1): 40-46, 1980

Patterns of organization of actin and myosin in normal and transformed cultured cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72(3): 994-998, 1975