EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The opponent process theory and affective reactions



The opponent process theory and affective reactions



Motivation & Emotion 9(4): 407-418



Solomon (1980) proposed an opponent process theory to account for motivational and affective dynamics. This theory asserts that the brain avoids extremes of emotional experience by countering the stimulation it receives with an opposite or "opponent" reaction. Opponent processes are thought to be responsible for the characteristic changes in affective experience that occur over time, and to account for the dynamics of affective response to such stimuli as skydiving and sauna bathing, which have heretofore been difficult to explain. However, the relevance of this theory for affective experiences in general (beyond physical stimuli and addictions) has yet to be demonstrated. The present paper examines opponent process theory predictions in two settings, involving affective responses to situation-scenarios and emotion-provoking slides. In each study, significant habituation to both positive and negative affective stimuli was found, as the opponent process theory would predict. Subjects also showed a reversal of affect when the stimuli were reversed from positive to negative or vice versa. However, contrary to opponent process theory predictions, there was no evidence that withdrawal responses were greater after habituation to the affective stimulus. The only instance of a significant difference in withdrawal responses was actually in a direction opposite to that which the opponent process theory predicts. All other predicted differences were not significant. The opponent process theory, therefore, was not supported in these data and appears to need revision or qualification as to its domains of application.

Accession: 006728492

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1007/bf00992209

Download PDF Full Text: The opponent process theory and affective reactions



Related references

An opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: the affective dynamics of addiction. Psychopathology: experimental models edited by Jack D Maser Martin E P Seligman: 03, 1977

Affective responses to acute exercise: a test of opponent-process theory. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 37(3): 205-212, 1998

Adaptation-level theory, opponent process theory, and dispositions: an integrated approach to the stability of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(6): 1044-1053, 2005

Ultrasonic vocalizations: evidence for an affective opponent process during cocaine self-administration. Psychopharmacology 231(5): 909-918, 2015

Anterior EEG asymmetries and opponent process theory. International Journal of Psychophysiology 63(3): 302-307, 2007

The motivation to breastfeed: a fit to the opponent-process theory?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49(1): 188-193, 1985

An opponent-process theory of motivation. II. Cigarette addiction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 81(2): 158-171, 1973

Induction of depressed mood: a test of opponent-process theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6): 1413-1422, 1984

An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review 81(2): 119-145, 1974

Recent experiments testing an opponent-process theory of acquired motivation. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 40(1): 271-289, 1980

An opponent process theory of habitual behavior with special reference to smoking. Nida Research Monograph: 157-185, 1977

Alcohol withdrawal and its treatment some conjectures in the context of the opponent process theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 43(5): 548-569, 1982

Examination of breastfeeding as an acquired motive: an application of the opponent-process theory. Dissertation Abstracts International, B Sciences and Engineering 45(3): 1026, 1985

An examination of opponent-process theory as an explanation for the anxiolytic effects of acute exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 33(5 Supplement): S50, 2001