+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections

Obstetrics and Gynecology 70(5): 713-717

Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has supported the concept of a trial of labor in patients with a previous lower uterine transverse cesarean section, and its safety is generally accepted. The purpose of this report was to present the results of a year-long, prospective study in which the indications for trial of labor were liberalized. Only patients with a previous classical incision or "T" incision on the uterus were excluded. Two hundred seventy-two patients elected to undergo a trial of labor. Vaginal delivery occurred in 216 patients (76.5%). Oxytocin was used as needed, and epidural anesthesia was used in all patients who requested it. One uterine rupture occurred in a patient with a single lower transverse scar. The results of this study suggest that a trial of labor is a safe alternative for patients with a previous single or multiple lower uterine transverse incision or a lower uterine vertical incision. In addition, the use of epidural anesthesia and oxytocin appears safe in patients undergoing a trial of labor.

Accession: 006840545

PMID: 3658277

DOI: 10.1097/00132582-198807000-00006

Related references

Chuang, J.H.; Jenders, R.A., 1999: Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis. In order to reduce the cesarean-delivery rate, more and more pregnant women are offered trials of labor (TOL) after their previous cesarean sections. TOL and elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) have different risks and benefits. We constructed...

Delaney, T.; Young, D.C., 2001: Trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section in twin gestations with previous cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in twin gestations undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section after prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the Nova Scotia A...

Fagerberg, M.C.; Marsal, K.; Källen, K., 2014: Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery. To compare the neonatal outcome after a trial of labor (TOL) with that after an elective cesarean section (CS) following one previous cesarean delivery, considering the indication for the first CS. Population-based cohort study. Sweden.PopulationW...

Wen, S.Wu.; Rusen, I.D.; Walker, M.; Liston, R.; Kramer, M.S.; Baskett, T.; Heaman, M.; Liu, S., 2004: Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the safety of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Study design: Retrospective cohort study of 308,755 Canadian women with previous cesarean delivery between 1988 and 2000. Occurrences of...

Porreco, R.P.; Meier, P.R., 1983: Trial of labor in patients with multiple previous cesarean sections. Trial of factor (TOL) in patients with multiple previous low transverse cesarean sections has not been investigated extensively, and information regarding the risks and benefits of this kind of management is largely unavailable. A combined series...

Anonymous, 1985: Repeated cesarean section rate vs success rate in evaluating trial of labor following one previous cesarean section

Horenstein, J.M.; Eglinton, G.S.; Tahilramaney, M.P.; Boucher, M.; Phelan, J.P., 1984: Oxytocin use during a trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean section. In patients who have had a previous cesarean section (C/S), the use of oxytocin during a trial of labor (TOL) remains controversial. In order to better delineate the risks associated with oxytocin usage in patients with prior C/S undergoing a TOL,...

Amir, W.; Peter, J.; Etan, Z., 1987: Trial of labor without oxytocin in patients with a previous cesarean section. In a 30-month period, 261 of 557 (46.8%) patients underwent a trial of labor. Of these, 215 patients (82.4%) achieved vaginal delivery. The major controversial issues regarding vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section are oxytoci...

Peaceman, A.M.; Gersnoviez, R.; Landon, M.B.; Spong, C.Y.; Leveno, K.J.; Varner, M.W.; Rouse, D.J.; Moawad, A.H.; Caritis, S.N.; Harper, M.; Wapner, R.J.; Sorokin, Y.; Miodovnik, M.; Carpenter, M.; O'Sullivan, M.J.; Sibai, B.M.; Langer, O.; Thorp, J.M.; Ramin, S.M.; Mercer, B.M., 2006: The MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of change in infant birth weight between pregnancies on the outcome of a trial of labor for women whose first cesarean delivery was performed for dystocia.Study design: Secondary...

Bujold, E.; Hammoud, A.O.; Hendler, I.; Berman, S.; Blackwell, S.C.; Duperron, L.; Gauthier, R.J., 2004: Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section: does maternal age influence the outcome?. Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of maternal age on the rate of vaginal delivery and the rate of uterine rupture in patients undergoing a trial of labor (TOL) after a prior cesarean delivery. Study design: A cohort study...