EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Weed control in field beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern 59 in western nebraska usa


Weed Science 28(3): 295-299
Weed control in field beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern 59 in western nebraska usa
In field studies conducted in 1971-1977 weed yields were higher in EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) and alachlor [2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide]-treated areas as compared to hand-weeded plots. Weeds present in EPTC- and alachlor-treated areas did not result in a significant field bean yield reduction as compared to hand-weeded plots. For every 1000 kg of dry weeds present in field beans there was a corresponding decrease in field bean yields of 208 kg/ha. Weed yields produced in plots treated with alachlor, dinitramine (N4,N4-diethyl-.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro -3,5-dinitrotoluene-2,4-diamine), EPTC, metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], trifluralin (.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) and profluralin [N-(cyclopropylmethyl)-.alpha.,.alpha.,.alpha.-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-p-toluidine] were significantly less when herbicides were incorporated with the rotary tiller as compared to incorporation with the spike-tooth harrow. Incorporation method was not as critical with butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine], with spike-tooth harrow incorporation of herbicides providing similar weed control to that obtained with the rotary tiller. Weed densities and yields were higher in plots seeded with field bean determinate variety 'Great Northern 1140' than in plots seeded with indeterminate variety 'Tara', when either EPTC or alachlor were applied preplant and incorporated. Neither field bean variety competed well with weeds when no herbicide was used.


Accession: 006915690



Related references

Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Nebraska. Weed Science 28(3): 295-299, 1980

Weed control in snap beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar gv 50. Proceedings Southern Weed Science Society 35: 118-128, 1982

Influence of ph on root rot of beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern caused by fusarium solani f sp phaseoli. Fitopatologia Brasileira 6(1): 93-100, 1981

Irrigation of great northern field beans in western Nebraska. 1961

Temperature and moisture influences on development of white mold disease sclerotinia sclerotiorum on beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern. Plant Disease 64(8): 757-759, 1981

Effects of germination on proteins raffinose oligo saccharides and anti nutritional factors in cultivar the great northern beans phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Food Science 48(6): 1796-1800, 1983

Embryo development in reciprocal crosses of phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern and phaseolus coccineus cultivar scarlet runner. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 62(1): 59-64, 1982

Solubilization and electrophoretic characterization of the great northern bean phaseolus vulgaris cultivar great northern proteins. Journal of Food Science 46(1): 82-87, 1981

Control of root rot beans with Agramine, 1980 Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris Great northern Ul 61), Gallatin Valley X 30904), root rot; Fusarium solani f.sp. phaseoli and Rhizoctonia solani. Fungicide and nematicide tests results American Phytopathological Society7(37): 58-59, 1982

Effect of row spacing on weed competition with snap beans phaseolus vulgaris cultivar checkmate. Weed Science 31(1): 81-85, 1983