+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cost analysis of two clindamycin dosing regimens



Cost analysis of two clindamycin dosing regimens



Dicp 23(12): 980-983



A clinical trial of clindamycin 900 mg q8h admixed with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg (eight-hourly group) versus clindamycin 600 mg q6h with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg given separately (six-hourly group) was analyzed for relative cost containment. Acquisition costs were significantly higher for the six-hourly group for intravenous supplies ($181.5 +/- 47.8) when compared with the eight-hourly group ($67.6 +/- 21.6) (p less than 0.05). Nursing administration costs were greater for the six-hourly group ($28.6 +/- 7.5) compared with ($10.7 +/- 3.4) for the eight-hourly group (p less than 0.05). Also, significantly higher cost (p less than 0.05) was noted for pharmacist and technician manufacturing cost for the six-hourly group ($15.4 +/- 4.0) compared with the eight-hourly group ($13.3 +/- 4.3). Incorporating all appropriate costs, the mean total drug therapy costs were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) for clindamycin 600 mg q6h ($527.4 +/- 143.0) compared with clindamycin 900 mg q8h ($433.3 +/- 99.2). The dosing of clindamycin 900 mg q8h admixed with gentamicin 1.5 mg/kg is a more cost-effective method of drug delivery with similar efficacy and safety when compared with clindamycin 600 mg q6h with gentamicin given separately.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 007165509

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2603453


Related references

Meta-analysis of parenteral clindamycin dosing regimens. Annals of PharmacoTherapy 29(9): 852-858, 1995

Comparative pharmacokinetics and serum inhibitory activity of clindamycin in different dosing regimens. Antimicrobial Agents and ChemoTherapy 32(12): 1825-1829, 1988

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oritavancin front-loaded dosing regimens to daily dosing: an analysis of the SIMPLIFI trial. Antimicrobial Agents and ChemoTherapy 55(7): 3476-3484, 2011

Estimation of the comparative therapeutic superiority of QD and BID dosing regimens, based on integrated analysis of dosing history data and pharmacokinetics. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 34(4): 549-558, 2007

A comparison of four buprenorphine dosing regimens using open-dosing procedures: Is twice-weekly dosing possible?. Addiction 95(7): 1069-1077, July, 2000

Cost-effectiveness analysis favors epoetin alfa to front-loaded regimens of darbepoetin alfa and dominates every other week dosing of darbepoetin alfa. Blood 102(11): 511b, November 16, 2003

Gentamicin and clindamycin therapy in postpartum endometritis: The efficacy of daily dosing versus dosing every 8 hours. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 188(1): 149-152, January, 2003

Trends in alpha-blocker treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension: Dosing regimens and cost comparisons. Clinical Therapeutics 19(4): 821-829, 1997

A microarray analysis of the temporal response of liver to methylprednisolone: a comparative analysis of two dosing regimens. Endocrinology 148(5): 2209-2225, 2007

Microarray analysis of the temporal response of skeletal muscle to methylprednisolone: comparative analysis of two dosing regimens. Physiological Genomics 30(3): 282-299, 2007

A cost comparison of clindamycin and aztreonam versus clindamycin and gentamicin in perforated or gangrenous appendicitis. Current Therapeutic Research 42(4): 680-689, 1987

Cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of ondansetron versus metoclopramide regimens: a hospital perspective from Italy. Pharmacoeconomics 5(3): 227-237, 1994