+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of 0.12 percent chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis



Evaluation of 0.12 percent chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis



Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 72(5): 524-526



A double-blind study evaluated the ability of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse to decrease the incidence of localized alveolar osteitis after the removal of mandibular third molar teeth. One hundred sixty extraction sites in 80 patients were evaluated. A statistically significant decrease in the incidence of dry socket was seen in patients using the chlorhexidine rinse with no significant adverse reactions. Thus a 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse is shown to be an effective means of decreasing alveolar osteitis that may follow removal of third molar teeth.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 007317316

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Evaluation of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 72(5): 524-526, 1991

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine gel versus chlorhexidine rinse in reducing alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 66(3): 441-445, 2008

Perioperative use of 0.12 percent chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis: Efficacy and risk factor analysis. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics 85(4): 381-387, April, 1998

The effect of a chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 49(9): 932-937, 1991

Comparison of two chlorhexidine rinse protocols on the incidence of alveolar osteitis following the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 7(2): 79-86, 2006

Effects of a chlorhexidine gluconate oral rinse on the incidence of alveolar osteitis in mandibular third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 48(5): 444-8; Discussion 449, 1990

Influence of Immediate Post-Extraction Irrigation With Chlorhexidine Rinse on Postoperative Pain and Incidence of Alveolar Osteitis of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 73(9): E52-E53, 2015

Evaluation of the perioperative use of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis after the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a clinical study. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 10(2): 101-111, 2012

Evaluation of the Perioperative Use of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate for the Prevention of Alveolar Osteitis After the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars A Clinical Study. 2011

Chlorhexidine for the prevention of alveolar osteitis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 41(10): 1253-1264, 2013

Chlorhexidine for prevention of alveolar osteitis: a randomised clinical trial. Journal of Applied Oral Science 26: E20170245-E20170245, 2018

Prevention of alveolar osteitis with chlorhexidine: a meta-analytic review. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 99(2): 155-159, 2005

Role of warm saline mouth rinse in prevention of alveolar osteitis: a randomized controlled trial. Nigerian Journal of Medicine 24(1): 28-31, 2015

Comparative Evaluation of 0.2 percent Chlorhexidine and Magnetized Water as a Mouth Rinse on Streptococcus mutans in Children. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 4(3): 190-194, 2011

Perioperative use of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for the prevention of alveolar osteitis: efficacy and risk factor analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 85(4): 381-387, 1998