+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Injection pain intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anesthesia with propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil



Injection pain intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anesthesia with propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil



Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 35(1): 19-23



In a double-blind study, propofol (P) 2-2.5 mg .cntdot. kg-1 preceded by saline (Sal) or alfentanil (A) 20-30 .mu.g .cntdot. kg-1 was used for anaesthetic induction in 59 young patients of ASA physical class I or II, premedicated with oxycodone 0.1 mg .cntdot. kg-1 and atropine 0.01 mg .cntdot. kg-1 i.m. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the four groups: Group 1 Sal + P2.5, Group 2 A20 + P2.5, Group 3 A30 + P2.5 and Group 4 A30 + P2. Pain on injection of propofol occurred in 67, 36 and 7% of the patients in the Sal + P2.5, A20 + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups, respectively, but not at all in the A30 + P2.5 group. Intubating conditions were assessed as good, moderate, poor or impossible on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the tube and coughing on intubation, each on a three-point scale. In impossible cases, suxamethonium was used. In the Sal + P2.5 group, the frequencies of good, moderate, poor and impossible intubating conditions were 0, 38, 8 and 54%, respectively. The corresponding figures in the A30 + P2.5 group were 43, 46, 7 and 14% (P < 0.05 between the groups). The other groups did not differ significantly from the Sal + P2.5 group. After injection of propofol, both systolic and diastolic arterial pressures decreased significantly in all other groups, with the exception of diastolic pressure in the Sal + P2.5 group, whereas heart rate did not differ from the control level. After intubation, systolic arterial pressure increased statistically significantly in the Sal + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups and diastolic arterial pressure in all other groups with the exception of the A30 + P2.5 group when compared with the corresponding preceding values. After intubation, heart rate decreased significantly in the A30 + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups. The mean QTc interval of the ECG was always in the normal range. It is concluded that the best method was the combination of alfentanil 30 .mu.g .cntdot. kg-1 and propofol 2.5 mg .cntdot. kg-1. It caused no pain on injection of propofol, offered satisfactory (good or moderate) intubating conditions in 79% of the patients and prevented the cardiovascular intubation response.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 007468217

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2006594


Related references

The effect of alfentanil on pain caused by the injection of propofol during anesthesia induction in children. Cahiers d'Anesthesiologie 39(6): 383-386, 1991

Evaluation of Intubating Conditions and Safety Following Rapacuronium, Succinylcholine or Placebo during Anesthesia with Alfentanil and Propofol. Anesthesiology Abstracts of Scientific Papers Annual Meeting (2000): Abstract No 1011, 2002

The effect of topical lignocaine on intubating conditions after propofol-alfentanil induction. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 40(6): 752-756, 1996

A combination of alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol in the absence of muscle relaxants. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 50(2): 116-120, 2003

Assessment of intubating conditions in children after induction with propofol and varying doses of alfentanil. British Journal of Anaesthesia 73(5): 596-599, 1994

Injection pain cardiovascular changes and recovery following induction of anaesthesia with porpofol in combination with alfentanil or lignocaine in children. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 36(6): 564-568, 1992

The influence of induction technique on intubating conditions 1 min after rocuronium administration: a comparison of a propofol-ephedrine combination and propofol. Anaesthesia 57(3): 223-226, 2002

Comparison of intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes after anesthesia induction with remifentanil or fentanyl and propofol. Journal of China Medical University 33(1): 78-79, 2004

Intubating conditions provided by alfentanil and propofol. Anesthesiology 79(3A): A16, 1993

Intubating conditions provided by propofol and alfentanil - acceptable, but not ideal. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 41(8): 985-987, 1997

Effect of lidocaine (40 mg) mixed to prevent injection pain of propofol on the intubating conditions and onset time of rocuronium. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 64(1): 29-33, 2013

Intubating conditions and neuromuscular effects of mivacurium during propofol-alfentanil anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 39(Suppl. 106): 26-29, 1995

Time-course of action and intubating conditions with rocuronium bromide under propofol-alfentanil anaesthesia. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. Supplement 11: 69-72, 1995