+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Leaf life span in relation to leaf plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems



Leaf life span in relation to leaf plant and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems



Ecological Monographs 62(3): 365-392



Variation in leaf life-span has long been considered of ecological significance. Despite this, quantitative evaluation of the relationships between leaf life-span and other plant and ecosystem characteristics has been rare. In this paper we ask whether leaf life-span is related to other leaf, plant, and stand traits of species from diverse ecosystems and biomes. We also examine the interaction between leaf, plant, and stand traits and their relation to productivity and ecological patterns. Among all species, both mass- (Amass) and area-based (Aarea) maximum net photosynthesis decreased with increasing leaf life-span, but the relationship was stronger on a mass (P < .001, r2 = 0.70) than an area (P < .05, r2 = 0.24) basis. Similarly, mass-based leaf nitrogen (leaf Nmass) decreased (P < .001, r2 = 0.52) with leaf life-span, but area-based leaf N (leaf Narea) did not (P > .25, r2 = 0.01). Specific leaf area (SLA, leaf area/ leaf dry mass) and leaf diffusive conductance also decreased with increasing leaf life-span. Decreasing Amass with increasing leaf life-span results from the impact of decreasing Nmass and SLA on Amass. Variation in leaf traits as a function of leaf life-span was similar for broad-leaved and needle-leaved subsets of the data. These leaf-scale data from several biomes were compared to a data set from a single biome, Amazonia. For several leaf traits (e.g., SLA, Nmass, and Amass) the quantitative relationship with leaf life-span was similar in the two independent data sets, suggesting that these are fundamental relations applicable to all species. Amass was a linear function of Nmass (P < .001, r2 = 0.74) with a regression similar to previous analyses, while Aarea was not significantly related to Narea. These results suggest that the photosynthesis-leaf N relationship among species should be considered universal when expressed on a mass, but not on a leaf area, basis. Relative growth rates (RGR) and leaf area ratio (LAR, the whole-plant ratio of leaf area to total dry mass) of seedlings decreased with increasing leaf life-span (P < .001, r2 = 0.61 and 0.89, respectively). LAR was positively related to both RGR and Amass (r2 = 0.68 and 0.84, respectively), and Amass and RGR were also positively related (r2 = 0.55). Absolute height growth rates of young trees decreased with increasing leaf life-span (P < .001, r2 = 0.72) and increased with Amass (P < .001, r2 = 0.78). It appears that a suite of traits including short leaf life-span and high leaf Nmass, SLA, LAR, and Amass interactively contribute to high growth rates in open-grown individuals. These traits interact similarly at the stand level, but stands differ from individuals in one key trait. In closed-canopy forests, species with longer lived foliage (and low LAR as seedlings) have greater foliage mass per unit ground area (P < .001, r2 = 0.74) and a greater proportion of total mass in foliage. The aboveground production efficiency (ANPP/foliar biomass) of forest stands decreased markedly with increasing leaf life-span or total foliage mass (P < .001, r2 = 0.78 and 0.72, respectively), probably as a result of decreasing Amass, Nmass, and SLA, all of which were positively related with production efficiency and negatively related to total foliage mass. However, high foliage mass of species with extended leaf life-spans appears to compensate for low production per unit foliage, since aboveground net primary production (ANPP, in megagrams per hectare per year) of forest stands was not related to leaf life-span. Extended leaf life-span also appears to compensate for lower potential production per unit leaf N per unit time, with the result that stand-level N use efficiency is weakly positively related to leaf life-span. We hypothesize that co-variation among species in leaf life-span, SLA, leaf Nmass, Amass, and growth rate reflects a set of mutually supporting traits that interact to determine plant behavior and production, and provide a useful conceptual link between processes at short-term leaf scales and longer term whole plant and stand-level scales. Although this paper has focused on leaf life-span, this trait is so closely interrelated with several others that this cohort of leaf traits should be viewed as causally interrelated. Generality in the relationships between leaf life-span and other plant traits across diverse communities and ecosystems suggests that they are universal in nature and thus can provide a quantitative link and/or common currency for ecological comparisons among diverse systems.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 007508110

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/2937116


Related references

How general are relations between photosynthetic capacity, leaf life-span, leaf nitrogen and other leaf traits? A test from six diverse ecosystems across broad climatic gradients. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 76(2 Suppl. Part 2): 223, 1995

Relationships between leaf life span, leaf mass per area, and leaf nitrogen cause different altitudinal changes in leaf delta 13C between deciduous and evergreen species. Botany: 11, 1233-1241, 2008

Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: A test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia (Berlin) 114(4): 471-482, 1998

Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf-span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia 14(4): 471-482, 1998

Ontogenetic changes in leaf phenology of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks differing in leaf life span. Ecological Research 24(5): 1083-1090, 2009

Comparison of leaf size and leaf life-span among selected tall and semidwarf spring wheat cultivars. Proceedings 52 72-77, 1973

Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span. Journal of ecology 90(3): 534-543, 2002

Geographical distribution of leaf life span and species diversity of trees simulated by a leaf-longevity model. Vegetatio 122(1): 61-67, 1996

Comparison of leaf life span, photosynthesis and defensive traits across seven species of deciduous broad-leaf tree seedlings. Annals of Botany 97(5): 813-817, 2006

Testing the correlations between leaf life span and leaf structural reinforcement in 13 species of European Mediterranean woody plants. Functional Ecology 22(5): 787-793, 2008

Relation between the decline of photosynthetic function and H2O2 accumulation in leaf life span of tobacco. Fen Zi Xi Bao Sheng Wu Xue Bao 39(4): 325-330, 2006

A cost-benefit analysis of acclimation to low irradiance in tropical rainforest tree seedlings: leaf life span and payback time for leaf deployment. Journal of Experimental Botany 62(11): 3941-3955, 2011

Comparison of leaf construction costs in woody species with differing leaf life-spans in contrasting ecosystems. New Phytologist 151(1): 213-226, 2001

Linking leaf life span to plant growth strategies in 15 species of co-occurring oaks. Selbyana 19(2): 271, 1998

Effect of snow-free duration on leaf life-span of four alpine plant species. Canadian Journal Of Botany. 70(8): 1684-1688, 1992