+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Rest versus exercise ejection fraction and the decision to perform valve replacement in aortic regurgitation



Rest versus exercise ejection fraction and the decision to perform valve replacement in aortic regurgitation



American Journal of Noninvasive Cardiology 2(1-2): 19-23



To study the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the decision to perform aortic valve replacement, the correlates of undergoing valve replacement were studied in 56 asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with isolated severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) undergoing exercise radionuclide angiography. The need for valve replacement was not indicated on clinical grounds, because symptoms were either mild or absent. Of a variety of noninvasive laboratory variables, stepwise logistic regression analysis showed the rest LVEF to be the best correlate of performing valve replacement. Valve replacement was performed in 24 (43%) of the patients including 5% of AR patients with rest LVEF of 0.50 or more, 40% of patients with rest LVEF of 0.41-0.49, and 88% of patients with rest LVEF of 0.40 or less, p < 0.001. Of the 20 patients within the intermediate rest LVEF range of 0.41-0.49, the 8 undergoing valve replacement had a similar test LVEF, but a lower exercise LVEF and older age, compared to the 12 not undergoing valve replacement. In conclusion, rest LVEF alone strongly correlates with the decision to perform valve replacement in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic AR. In the higher and lower LVEF ranges, the rest value is the best correlate of whether the patient will have surgery and little or no additional information is provided by exercising the patient. Only in the intermediate LVEF range is this decision unpredictable by the rest value. physicians appear to consider rest LVEF a powerful prognosticator as evidenced by the decision-making patterns observed.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 007752787

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Prediction of outcome late after aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation utilizing pre-operative wall-stress-adjusted change in ejection fraction from rest to exericse. Circulation 98(17 SUPPL ): I475, Oct 27, 1998

Aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Circulation 108(6): E43; Author Reply E43-E43; Author Reply E43, 2003

Outcomes following aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced ejection fraction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 37(2 Supplement A): 486A, February, 2001

Relation between exercise-induced changes in ejection fraction and systolic loading conditions at rest in aortic regurgitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 3(4): 924-929, 1984

Reproducibility of rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in chronic aortic regurgitation. American Journal of Cardiology 59(15): 1361-1365, 1987

Chronic aortic regurgitation Natural history of rest and exercise ejection fraction and relation to outcome. Circulation 100(18 SUPPL ): I 519, Nov 2, 1999

Left ventricular ejection fraction change with exercise versus ejection fraction at rest in coronary artery disease: implications for using ejection fraction variations in making therapeutic decisions. American Journal of Therapeutics 11(3): 164-170, 2004

Severe aortic regurgitation and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement and combined surgery. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 29(4): 445-448, 2010

Comparison of the results of aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% versus patients with ejection fraction >30%. American Journal of Cardiology 104(12): 1717-1721, 2010

Preoperative ejection fraction determines early recovery of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension after aortic valve replacement for chronic severe aortic regurgitation. Journal of Surgical Research 196(1): 49-55, 2015

Left ventricular function at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation. American Journal of Cardiology 44(7): 1297-1305, 1979

Hemodynamic and echo profiles at rest and peak exercise before and after aortic valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 21(2 SUPPL A): 63A, 1993

Natural history of left ventricular performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation. Circulation 84(5 Suppl): Iii133-9, 1991

Early and late postoperative ventricular function after valve replacement for aortic regurgitation with impaired ejection fraction. European Heart Journal 9(ABSTR SUPPL 1): 162, 1988

Survival benefit of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis with low ejection fraction and low gradient with normal ejection fraction. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 86(6): 1781-1789, 2008