+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Visual masking and unconscious processing differences between backward and simultaneous masking



Visual masking and unconscious processing differences between backward and simultaneous masking



Memory & Cognition. 18(4): 430-435



Visual masking procedures are considered to have great potential for studying information processing that occurs outside of consciousness. Unfortunately, effects that indicate processing of masked word stimuli have been both difficult to obtain, and once obtained, difficult to replicate. The present seven experiments failed to obtain an effect of lexicality (word vs. nonword targets) on detection that was recently reported by Doyle and Leach (1988). Whereas Doyle and Leach had used backward binocular masking, most of the present experiments used simultaneous dichoptic masking. Doyle (1990) recently suggested that the effect of lexicality on detection (coupled with an effect of knowledge results, which was also obtained in the present research) could explain why Greenwald, Klinger, and Liu (1989) found no evidence for detectability of masked words that were nevertheless analyzed semantically. The differences of the present findings from those of Doyle and Leach (1988) not only confirm the uncertainity of generalizing across masking procedures, but also indicate that Greenwald et al.'s "detectionless processing" interpretation remains viable.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008000882

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 2381322

DOI: 10.3758/bf03197132


Related references

Auditory masking patterns in forward, backward, and simultaneous-masking situations. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 52(2): 106-112, 1981

Visual backward masking by pattern mask a study of u shaped masking functions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 2(5B): 336, 1973

U-shaped masking functions in visual backward masking: Effects of target configuration and retinal position. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 7(4): 253-256, 1970

Masking level differences in forward and backward masking. Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of Americapart 2: 1365-1367, 1972

Spatial processing and visual backward masking. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 3(1-2): 85-92, 2007

Developmental differences in visual backward masking. Child Development 51(4): 1081-1089, 1980

Backward masking and interference with the processing of brief visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103(5): 934-940, 1974

Age differences in backward monoptic visual noise masking. Journal of Gerontology 30(3): 307-311, 1975

A comparison of masking by visual and transcranial magnetic stimulation: implications for the study of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Consciousness and Cognition 13(4): 829-843, 2004

Visual perceptual processing rates and backward and forward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89(2): 306-313, 1971

Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking. Psychological Research 36(1): 71-93, 1973

Visual processing of multielement arrays and selective backward masking. Acta Psychologica 49(3): 215-232, 1981

Does backward masking by visual noise stop stimulus processing?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 4(6): 328-330, 1968

Developmental change in visual information processing under backward masking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 17(1): 133-146, 1974

Age-related differences in binocular backward masking with visual noise. Journal of Gerontology 33(5): 702-710, 1978