+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Work load and physiological responses during asbestos removal with protective clothing



Work load and physiological responses during asbestos removal with protective clothing



International Archives Of Occupational & Environmental Health. 63(4): 241-246



The removal of asbestos-containing building materials requires the use of dust-repelling protective clothing and a respirator. The present study was aimed at measuring physiological responses to asbestos removal in actual work situations. The subjects were eight asbestos workers. During the work, the men wore permeable or impermeable clothing along with a powered or non-powered filtering device including a full-face or half-face mask. Environmental parameters, work postures, heart rate (HR), the skin temperature at two sites and the rectal temperature were recorded every minute during work. Perceived exertion, thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and skin wetness were rated by the subjects. The ambient temperature at work sites ranged from 19.degree. to 37.5.degree. C and relative humidity, from 21% to 50%. The mean HR ranged from 101 to 141 beats min-1. The calculated (from HR measurements) average oxygen consumption (VO2) varied from 0.9 to 1.9 l min-1, which corresponded to 27%-60% of the maximal value. The peak rectal temperature and the highest mean of two measurements of skin temperature were 37.7.degree. .+-. 0.3.degree. C and 34.4.degree. .+-. 0.9.degree. C, respectively. The sweat rate varied from 162 to 583 g h-1. Poor work posture was common during asbestos removal. The arms were elevated over shoulder level for 35% of the work time. During the work the mean physiological strain was considered to be moderate, with some heavy peak loads being registered. The increases in HR and the thermal responses seemed to be due primarily to the use of simple, nonpowered hand tools, which often required the performance of heavy manual work with the arms held above shoulder level, and less to the protective clothing used. The heat strain during asbestos removal was not excessive because most of the work was done under thermoneutral conditions, and a rest pause of 10-15 min every hour also decreased the thermal strain during work. Improvements in work methods and tools are needed to reduce the peak loads and postural strain experienced during asbestos removal.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008007080

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 1743765

DOI: 10.1007/bf00386372


Related references

A survey on physiological strains of asbestos abatement work wearing protective clothing in summer. Annals of Physiological Anthropology 12(1): 31-38, 1993

Physiological strains in hot-humid conditions while wearing disposable protective clothing commonly used by the asbestos removal industry. Ergonomics 36(10): 1241-1250, 1993

Effect of clothing layers in combination with fire fighting personal protective clothing on physiological and perceptual responses to intermittent work and on materials performance test results. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 10(5): 259-269, 2013

Work tolerance and physiological responses to thermal environment wearing protective NBC clothing. Ergonomics 39(4): 620-633, 1996

Effects of thermal environment and chemical protective clothing on work tolerance, physiological responses, and subjective ratings. Ergonomics 34(4): 445-457, 1991

Quantification of heat balance during work in three types of asbestos-protective clothing. International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health 64(4): 243-249, 1992

Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work. Ergonomics 32(9): 1111-1123, 1989

Physiological factors associated with work termination in protective clothing users. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 25(5 SUPPL ): S121, 1993

Physiological strain in work with gas protective clothing at low ambient temperature. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 46(12): 720-723, 1985

Physiological comparison of protective clothing variations during prolonged work. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 27(5 SUPPL ): S153, 1995

Physiological factors limiting work tolerance in chemical protective clothing. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 13(2): 147-155, 1994

Physiological tolerance to work in a hot humid environment wearing protective clothing. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine 61(5): 480, 1990

Physiological Method of Evaluating Protective Clothing for Work in a Cold Environment. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 1(3): 235-243, 1995

Empirical prediction of physiological response to prolonged work in encapsulating protective clothing. Ergonomics 37(9): 1503-1512, 1994

Physiological and subjective responses to cooling devices on firefighting protective clothing. European Journal of Applied Physiology 104(2): 369-374, 2008