+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative evaluation of oral contraceptive use and associated compliance issues in a rural population

A comparative evaluation of oral contraceptive use and associated compliance issues in a rural population

Clinical Therapeutics 17(3): 541-551

One hundred thirty-three patients were enrolled in a study designed to evaluate and compare oral contraceptive use in three rural communities. The patients averaged 31 years old (range, 13 to 49 years); 92% were white, 4.5% Hispanic, and 3% Native American. Genora, Ortho-Novum, and Triphasil were the most frequently prescribed oral contraceptives. Triphasic oral contraceptives accounted for one third (n = 64) of 203 prescriptions, and conventional monophasic preparations accounted for two thirds. Twenty percent (n = 26) of the patients studied were non-compliant. The most frequent causes of noncompliance cited were cost and inconvenience. However, generic alternatives were requested in only 43% of the cases for which generic equivalents were available. Less-expensive alternatives (eg, generic products, medroxyprogesterone acetate injection) should be advocated to deter patient noncompliance because of cost issues. Drug interactions and adverse effects were not reported in our patient population and thus did not contribute to noncompliance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008029264

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7585858

DOI: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80120-0

Related references

Oral contraceptive non-compliance in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Biosocial Science 36(6): 647-661, 2004

Oral contraceptive compliance and reproductive health knowledge in rural Nicaragua. Journal of Investigative Medicine 46(1): 112A, 1998

Oral contraceptive compliance in rural Colombia: knowledge of users and providers. International Family Planning Perspectives 14(1): 27-31, 1988

Factors associated with compliance to oral contraceptive use in an adolescent population. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 3(2): 120-123, 1982

Contraceptive compliance with a levonorgestrel triphasic and a norethindrone monophasic oral contraceptive in adolescent patients. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 166(3): 901-907, 1992

Comparative study on the acceptance and use of contraceptive methods in a rural population in Kelantan. Malaysian Journal of Reproductive Health 8(2): 66-71, 1990

Compliance and use behaviour, an issue in injectable as well as oral contraceptive use? A study of injectable and oral contraceptive use in Johannesburg. British Journal of Family Planning 24(1): 21-23, 1998

Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285(18): 2347-2354, 2001

A baseline evaluation of contraceptive use patterns in three population pilot schemes in rural Bangladesh. A baseline evaluation of contraceptive use patterns in three population pilot schemes in rural Bangladesh: xiii+52, 1978

Evaluation of the contraceptive efficacy, compliance, and satisfaction with the transdermal contraceptive patch system Evra: a comparison between adolescent and adult users. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 283(3): 525-530, 2011

Comparative evaluation of the effect of mono-, bi- and three-phase oral contraceptive tablets on the endometrium. Acta Pharmaceutica Hungarica 62(6): 284-294, 1992

Reasons for Non-compliance of Patients to Attend Referral Hospital After Screening for Oral Pre-cancer Lesions through Camp Approach in Rural Population of Indiaa. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research 3(Suppl 1): S54, 2013

Comparative contraceptive efficacy and mechanism of action of the norgestimate-containing triphasic oral contraceptive. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement 156: 9-14, 1992

The multiload copper intra-uterine contraceptive device in a mixed urban and rural population: A 3-year clinical evaluation. South African Medical Journal 56(14): 571-572, 1979

Oral contraceptive compliance during adolescence. Annals of the new York Academy of Sciences 816: 422-431, 1997