+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital

A comparison of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrests occurring in the hospital

New England Journal of Medicine 329(26): 1918-1921

Recent studies have demonstrated improved cardiopulmonary circulation during cardiac arrest with the use of a hand-held suction device (Ambu CardioPump) to perform active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The purpose of this study was to compare active compression-decompression with standard CPR during cardiac arrests in hospitalized patients. All patients over the age of 18 years who had a witnessed cardiac arrest while hospitalized at our center were enrolled in this trial; they were randomly assigned according to their medical-record numbers to receive either active compression-decompression or standard CPR. The study end points were the rates of initial resuscitation, survival at 24 hours, hospital discharge, and neurologic outcome. Compressions were performed according to the recommendations of the American Heart Association (80 to 100 compressions per minute; depth of compression, 3.8 to 5.1 cm [1.5 to 2 in.]; and 50 percent of the cycle spent in compression). Sixty-two patients (45 men and 17 women) with a mean age (+/- SE) of 68 +/- 2 years were entered into the trial. Sixty-two percent of the patients who underwent active compression-decompression were initially resuscitated, as compared with 30 percent of the patients who received standard CPR (P < 0.03); 45 percent of the patients who underwent active compression-decompression survived for at least 24 hours, as compared with 9 percent of patients who underwent standard CPR (P < 0.004). Two of the 62 study patients survived to hospital discharge; both were randomly assigned to receive active compression-decompression. Neurologic outcome, as measured by the Glasgow coma score, was better with active compression-decompression (8.0 +/- 1.3) than with standard CPR (3.5 +/- 0.3; P < 0.02). In this preliminary study, we found that, as compared with standard CPR, active compression-decompression CPR improved the rate of initial resuscitation, survival at 24 hours, and neurologic outcome after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Larger trials will be required to assess the potential benefit in terms of long-term survival.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008030651

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8018138

DOI: 10.1056/nejm199312233292603

Related references

A comparison of standard and a modified method of two resuscitator adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation: description of a new system for research into advanced life support skills. Resuscitation 38(1): 7-12, 1998

Comparison of standard capillary and chip separations of sodium dodecylsulfate-protein complexes. Journal of Chromatography A 990(1-2): 153-158, 21 March, 2003

A Comparison of Solids Fluxes in a Pair of Downer and Riser Reactors. Chemical Engineering and Technology 23(8): 701-705, 2000

A comparison of staining techniques to improve precision of age estimation from fish otoliths. Journal of Fish Biology 61(3): 839-841, 2002

Comparison of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctions in open versus closed spinal dysraphism: A prospective cross-sectional study of 318 patients. Neurourology and Urodynamics 37(8): 2818-2826, 2018

Standard and non-standard settings of superspace groups. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography 68(A1): S208-S208, 2012

Standard business practice has been around in academia. Journal of Business Continuity and Emergency Planning 7(1): 4-5, 2013

Learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills: does the type of mannequin make a difference?. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 4(4): 204-209, 1997

Does activation of the anti proton, rather than concertedness, determine the stereochemistry of base-catalyzed 1,2-elimination reactions? Anti stereospecificity in E1cB eliminations of β-3-trifluoromethylphenoxy esters, thioesters, and ketones. Journal of Organic Chemistry 77(6): 2819-2828, 2012

Evaluation value of human antibacterial peptide LL-37 on the prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 30(11): 1011-1016, 2018

A Comparison of the Effect Between Coronoid Process Graft and Costochondral Graft in the Reconstruction of Temporomandibular Joint. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 27(2): E197-E200, 2016

A prospective follow-up study on the role of clinical pharmacists in sustainably optimized pain measurement and pain therapy consequences. Die Pharmazie 74(5): 313-318, 2019

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation of a near-drowned child with a combination of epinephrine and vasopressin. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 6(4): 486-488, 2005

Comparison of an LH-RH analogue with combined androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer Final survival results of an international multicentre randomized-trial. European Urology. 37(2): 205-211,., 2000

Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a novel method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. American Heart Journal 124(5): 1145-1150, 1992