+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure



A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure



New England Journal of Medicine 339(7): 429-435



The role of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation delivered through a face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure is uncertain. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as compared with endotracheal intubation with conventional mechanical ventilation in 64 patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure who required mechanical ventilation. Within the first hour of ventilation, 20 of 32 patients (62 percent) in the noninvasive-ventilation group and 15 of 32 (47 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group had an improved ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO2) (P=0.21). Ten patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group subsequently required endotracheal intubation. Seventeen patients in the conventional-ventilation group (53 percent) and 23 in the noninvasive-ventilation group (72 percent) survived their stay in the intensive care unit (odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 1.4; P=0.19); 16 patients in the conventional-ventilation group and 22 patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group were discharged from the hospital. More patients in the conventional-ventilation group had serious complications (66 percent vs. 38 percent, P=0.02) and had pneumonia or sinusitis related to the endotracheal tube (31 percent vs. 3 percent, P=0.003). Among the survivors, patients in the noninvasive-ventilation group had shorter periods of ventilation (P=0.006) and shorter stays in the intensive care unit (P=0.002). In patients with acute respiratory failure, noninvasive ventilation was as effective as conventional ventilation in improving gas exchange and was associated with fewer serious complications and shorter stays in the intensive care unit.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008031624

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9700176

DOI: 10.1056/nejm199808133390703


Related references

A Comparison of Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. Survey of Anesthesiology 43(4): 202-203, 1999

Comparison of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and invasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 20(2): 150, 2005

Acute respiratory failure: comparison of spontaneous ventilation with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mechanical ventilation with positive and expiratory pressure (CPPV) in 6 cases. La Nouvelle Presse Medicale 8(2): 113-115, 1979

Integrated use of negative pressure ventilation and noninvasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure. Chest 118(4 Suppl ): 176S, 2000

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation for neonatal continuous positive airway pressure failure. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 5(8): 1045-1053, 2014

Negative pressure ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in COPD patients. European Respiratory Journal 12(3): 519-525, 1998

Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. A randomized comparison with conventional therapy. Chest 107(3): 761-768, 1995

Comparison of alveolar ventilation, oxygenation, pressure support, and respiratory system resistance in response to noninvasive versus conventional mechanical ventilation in foals. American Journal of Veterinary Research 58(12): 1463-1467, 1997

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure: integrated use of negative pressure ventilation and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Chest 125(6): 2217-2223, 2004

Traumatic respiratory insufficiency: comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation to high-frequency positive pressure with low-rate ventilation. Critical Care Medicine 15(2): 118-121, 1987

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure. Medical Journal, Armed Forces India 60(3): 224-226, 2004

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. Clinics in Chest Medicine 17(3): 513-553, 1996

Cardiovascular effects of high frequency positive pressure ventilation jet ventilation and conventional ventilation in respiratory failure. American Review Of Respiratory Disease Part 2: A436, 1987

Comparison of invasive and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by means of a helmet for weaning of patients from mechanical ventilation. Journal of Critical Care 29(4): 580-585, 2015

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure?. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine 2(1): 55-62, 2008