EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Advantages and disadvantages of bordeaux mixture and of lime-sulphur used on apples in the growing season
Observations on the Umaria marine bed
10 years of hearing conservation in the Royal Air Force
Chocolate crumb - dairy ingredient for milk chocolate
Effect of daily gelatin ingestion on human scalp hair
Comparison of rice bran and maize bran as feeds for growing and fattening pigs
The composition of pampas-grass (Cortaderia argentea.)
The Accraian Series:
The mechanism of the Liebermann-Burchard reaction of sterols and triterpenes and their esters
Cerebrovascular Doppler ultrasound studies (cv-Doppler)
Toria: PT-303 - first national variety
Hair growth promoting activity of tridax procumbens
Productivity of Pekin x Khaki Campbell ducks
A stable cytosolic expression of VH antibody fragment directed against PVY NIa protein in transgenic potato plant confers partial protection against the virus
Solar treatment of wheat loose smut
Swimmers itch in the Lake of Garda
Bactofugation and the Bactotherm process
The effects of prefrontal lobotomy on aggressive behavior in dogs
Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm
Breakdown of seamounts at the trench axis, viewed from gravity anomaly
Kooken; pennsylvania's toughest cave
Recovery of new dinosaur and other fossils from the Early Cretaceous Arundel Clay facies (Potomac Group) of central Maryland, U.S.A
Zubor horny (Bison bonasus) v prirodnych podmienkach Slovensku
The extended Widal test in the diagnosis of fevers due to Salmonella infection
Hair of the american mastodon indicates an adaptation to a semi aquatic habitat

A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department


A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department



Annals of Emergency Medicine 24(4): 685-690



ISSN/ISBN: 0196-0644

PMID: 8092595

DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70279-9

Study objective: Shock index (SI) (heart rate/systolic blood pressure; normal range, 0.5 to 0.7) and conventional vital signs were compared to identify acute critical illness in the emergency department. Design: Quasi-prospective study. Patients: Two hundred seventy-five consecutive adults who presented for urgent medical care. Interventions: Patients had vital signs, SI, and triage priority recorded on arrival in the ED and then their final disposition. Results: Two groups were identified retrospectively by the SI; group 1 (41) had an SI of more than 0.9, and group 2 (234) had an SI of less than 0.9 on arrival in the ED. Although both groups had apparently stable vital signs on arrival, group 1 had a significantly higher proportion of patients who were triaged to a priority requiring immediate treatment (23 versus 45; P lt .01) and required admission to the hospital (35 versus 105; P lt .01) and continued therapy in an ICU (10 versus 13; P lt .01). Conclusion: With apparently stable vital signs, an abnormal elevation of the SI to more than 0.9 was associated with an illness that was treated immediately, admission to the hospital, and intensive therapy on admission. The SI may be useful to evaluate acute critical illness in the ED.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008032768

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Evaluation of the Significance of Vital Signs in the Up-Triage of Patients Visiting Emergency Department from Emergency Severity Index Level 3 to 2. Acta Medica Iranica 54(6): 366-369, 2016

Critical illness in the emergency department: lessons learnt from the first 12 months of enrolments in the Critical Illness and Shock Study. Emergency Medicine Australasia: Ema 24(1): 31-36, 2012

The ability of traditional vital signs and shock index to identify ruptured ectopic pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189(5): 1293-1296, 2003

Which Vital Signs from the Initial Assessment are Associated With Development of Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock in the Emergency Department?. Annals of Emergency Medicine 64(4): S18-S19, 2014

Homocysteine, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C>T polymorphism and hypertension: effect modifiers by lifestyle factors and population subgroups. British Journal of Nutrition 2020: 1-11, 2020

How emergency department nurses identify and respond to critical illness. Emergency Nurse: the Journal of the Rcn Accident and Emergency Nursing Association 13(3): 24-33, 2005

Vital Signs Are Not Associated with Self-Reported Acute Pain Intensity in the Emergency Department. Cjem 18(1): 19-27, 2016

Derivation and Validation of Predictive Factors for Clinical Deterioration after Admission in Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Abnormal Vital Signs Without Shock. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 16(7): 1059-1066, 2015

Normalization of vital signs does not reduce the probability of acute pulmonary embolism in symptomatic emergency department patients. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 19(1): 11-17, 2012

The use of vital signs as predictors for serious bacterial infections in children with acute febrile illness in a pediatric emergency setting in Sudan. Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics 14(2): 35-40, 2014

Self-Check-In Kiosks Utilization and Their Association With Wait Times in Emergency Departments in the United States. Journal of emergency medicine 58(5): 829-840, 2020

Combinations of early signs of critical illness predict in-hospital death-the SOCCER study (signs of critical conditions and emergency responses). Resuscitation 71(3): 327-334, 2006

Triage vital signs predict in-hospital mortality among emergency department patients with acute poisoning: a case control study. Bmc Health Services Research 12: 262-269, 2012

Age shock index, shock index, and modified shock index for predicting postintubation hypotension in the emergency department. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 38(5): 911-915, 2020

Using the Reverse Shock Index at the Injury Scene and in the Emergency Department to Identify High-Risk Patients: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(4): 357, 2016