+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Clinical significance of microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and surrounding liver: possible involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor in the angiogenesis of cirrhotic liver



Clinical significance of microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and surrounding liver: possible involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor in the angiogenesis of cirrhotic liver



Hepatology 27(6): 1554-1562



As in other tumors, the assessment of microvessel density (MVD) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be essential to perform an effective anti-angiogenic therapy for this tumor. The relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and MVD of HCC as well as the surrounding liver remains to be elucidated. In 71 patients who had undergone curative hepatic resection for HCC, MVD and VEGF expressions were evaluated for HCC and the liver by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or immunostaining. The intensity and extent of VEGF immunoreactivity were evaluated using a computer image analyzer-cell analysis system (CAS). Angiographic data were re-evaluated and compared with MVD in 50 tumors. Tumoral MVD was significantly correlated with tumor capsule formation (t test, P = .0016). Small HCCs (< or = 2 cm) had a significantly lower MVD compared with moderate-sized HCCs (2-5 cm) (t test, P = .016), and the MVD of large HCCs was relatively lower than that of moderate tumors. Tumor vascularity on angiography was not correlated with the MVD. Neither VEGF mRNA levels nor protein expression in HCC were correlated with the tumoral MVD or any histopathological features of the tumor. However, cirrhotic livers had significantly higher MVD and VEGF expressions compared with noncirrhotic livers (t test, P = .0015 and P = .047, respectively). Only the MVD of tumor was significantly correlated with intrahepatic recurrence (t test, P = .0048) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates (log rank test, P = .0035). Moreover, the MVD was an independent predictor for DFS by multivariate analysis (chi2 test, P = .03). In conclusion, the MVD in HCC may be involved in the dismal prognosis of this tumor, and VEGF may be associated with the angiogenic process of the cirrhotic liver, but not with the angiogenesis of HCC.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008328201

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9620326

DOI: 10.1002/hep.510270613


Related references

Relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor expression and microvessel density in hepatocellular carcinomas and their surrounding liver tissue. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 25(2): 132-134, 2002

Correlation of vascular endothelial cell proliferation with microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Medical Investigation 51(3-4): 202-209, 2004

The significance of vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression, microvessel density and lymphatic microvessel density in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 16(6): 465-466, 2008

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and the surrounding liver and correlation with MRI findings. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 184(3): 832-841, 2005

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and the surrounding liver: correlation with angiographically assisted CT. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 183(6): 1585-1593, 2004

Microvessel density in relation to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta Prognostic significance in ovarian carcinoma. Virchows Archiv 439(3): 340, 2001

Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma and the surrounding liver: correlation with MR imaging and angiographically assisted CT. Abdominal Imaging 31(1): 78-89, 2005

Clinical significance of the expression of isoform 165 vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA in noncancerous liver remnants of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World Journal of Gastroenterology 11(2): 187-192, 2005

The expression and significance of vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor and intratumor microvessel formation in bladder carcinoma. Journal of China Medical University 31(2): 108-109, 2002

Intratumoral microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 10(3): 170-173, 2002

Gene transfers of vascular endothelial growth factor-A, vascular endothelial growth factor-B, vascular endothelial growth factor-C, and vascular endothelial growth factor-D have no effects on atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic low-density lipoprotein-receptor/apolipoprotein B48-deficient mice. Circulation 112(9): 1347-1352, 2005

Prognostic significance of microvessel density, vascular cuffing and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in ovarian carcinoma: A special review for clear cell adenocarcinoma. Cancer Letters 176(1): 111-118, February 8, 2002

Microvessel density and expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived endothelial growth factor in oral squamous cell carcinomas. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 34(5): 559-565, 2005

The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in primary liver cancer. Zhongguo Zhongliu Linchuang 27(4): 249-251, 2000

Expression and clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Ai Zheng 24(9): 1132-1135, 2005