EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Coastal sage scrub series of western Riverside County, California



Coastal sage scrub series of western Riverside County, California



Madrono 44(1): 95-105, Jan -March



The widely used term "Riversidian sage scrub" distinguishes coastal sage scrub in interior cismontane southern California from stands elsewhere but does not account for the considerable variation among stands within the region. Coastal sage scrub classification has generally emphasized either regional or floristic variation. We collected data at 181 coastal sage scrub sites in western Riverside County and classified them using multivariate cluster analyses of structural and floristic variables of shrub canopies. Roughly half of the sites fell into seven coastal sage scrub "series," largely comparable to the six interior basin "associations" described by Kirkpatrick and Hutchinson (1977). Our analysis splits Kirkpatrick and Hutchinson's Artemisia californica-Eriogonum fasciculatum-Salvia apiana association into three series; we did not sample their Lepidospartum squamatum-Eriodictyon crassifolium-Yucca whipplei association; and we recognize a deerweed series not sampled in their work. Similarities to the earlier analysis indicate that classification of this vegetation is largely repeatable, while discrepancies result from differing methodology and interpretation. The large proportion of unclassified plots suggests that these series represent segments of continua rather than discrete communities. We encourage land use planners to recognize variation among coastal sage scrub series within geographic regions to assure adequate conservation planning.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 008338315

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/41425182



Related references

Historical decline of coastal sage scrub in the Riverside-Perris Plain, California. Western Birds 29(4): 366-391, 1998

Coastal sage scrub variations of San Diego County and their influence on the distribution of the California gnatcatcher. Western Birds, 294: 392-405, 1998

Evaluating the California Gnatcatcher as an umbrella species for conservation of southern California coastal sage scrub. Conservation Biology 15(5): 1374-1383, October, 2001

Coastal sage scrub succession California, Baja California. USDA Forest Service general technical report PSW United States Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station: (58) 91-99, 1982

Postfire recovery of California coastal sage scrub. American midland naturalist 111(1): 105-117, 1984

Competition for light and a dynamic boundary between chaparral and coastal sage scrub found in the Santa Monica Mountains in coastal southern California, Ceanothus. Madrono 30(1): 43-49, 1983

Fire mosaics in southern California and northern Baja California Severe wildfires, grassland, coastal sage scrub, and chaparral, Mexico. Science 219(4590): 1287-1294, 1983

An example of the California Gnatcatcher nesting in restored coastal sage scrub. Western Birds 29(4): 434-438, 1998

Post fire recovery of california usa coastal sage scrub. American Midland Naturalist 111(1): 105-117, 1984

Seasonal dimorphism of foliage in California coastal sage scrub. Oecologia 1(3): 385-388, 1981

Fire management in coastal sage-scrub, Southern California, USA. Environmental conservationer 12(2): 141-146, 1985

Role of fire in the germination of california usa chaparral and coastal sage scrub. American Journal of Botany 74(5): 653, 1987

German ivy control in the coastal sage scrub regions of southern California. Research progress report Western Society of Weed Science: 1, 1986