+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Different estrogen receptor structural domains are required for estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent anti-proliferative activity in human mammary epithelial cells expressing an exogenous estrogen receptor



Different estrogen receptor structural domains are required for estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent anti-proliferative activity in human mammary epithelial cells expressing an exogenous estrogen receptor



Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 62(5-6): 373-383,.



Estrogen (E) inhibits the growth of both non-tumorigenic, immortal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) and breast cancer cells which stably express exogenous estrogen receptors (ER). The anti-estrogenic compounds 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (HT) and ICI 164384 (ICI) have different effects on the growth of the ER-transfectants. HT is a potent growth inhibitor, while ICI has no effect by itself but is able to block the anti-proliferative effects of E and HT. In order to elucidate the mechanism by which E or HT-bound ER inhibit cell growth, we have evaluated the effects of these compounds on the growth of HMEC stably expressing ER with mutations or deletions in the N-terminal A/B domain, the DNA-binding domain (DBD), and the C-terminal ligand-binding domain. These studies revealed that E and HT require different structural domains of the ER for their anti-proliferative activities. The N-terminal A/B domain is required for HT-, but not E-dependent growth inhibition. The DNA-binding domain of the ER is not essential for HT-mediated anti-proliferative effects, but is important for E-dependent activity. The effect of ER mutations on the ligand-inducible expression of the endogenous progesterone receptor (PR) and pS2 genes was also evaluated. Neither gene was induced in the cells containing the ER mutated in the DBD, even though cell growth was inhibited. These results suggest that E and HT use different pathways to elicit their anti-proliferative effects and that this occurs via modulation of genes that are controlled by mechanisms different from those important for activation of the PR and pS2 genes.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008467950

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9449240

DOI: 10.1016/s0960-0760(97)00052-6


Related references

Estrogen inhibits the growth of estrogen receptor-negative, but not estrogen receptor-positive, human mammary epithelial cells expressing a recombinant estrogen receptor. Cancer Research 53(20): 5004-5011, 1993

Estrogen inhibits the growth of immortal human mammary epithelial cells expressing a recombinant estrogen receptor. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Suppl. (16 Part C): 39, 1992

Induction of estrogen-regulated genes differs in immortal and tumorigenic human mammary epithelial cells expressing a recombinant estrogen receptor. Molecular Endocrinology 5(11): 1613-1623, 1991

Dissection of the mechanism of estrogen- and tamoxifen-dependent anti-proliferative effects on ER-transfected human mammary epithelial cells. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 35: 265, 1994

Estrogen-dependent rapid activation of protein kinase C in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells and estrogen receptor-negative HCC38 cells is membrane-mediated and inhibited by tamoxifen. Endocrinology 144(5): 1812-1824, 2003

Tamoxifen regulation of bone growth and endocrine function in the ovariectomized rat: discrimination of responses involving estrogen receptor α/estrogen receptor β, G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, or estrogen-related receptor γ using fulvestrant (ICI 182780). Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 338(1): 246-254, 2011

Effect of benzophenone-1 and octylphenol on the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition via an estrogen receptor-dependent pathway in estrogen receptor expressing ovarian cancer cells. Food and Chemical Toxicology 93: 58-65, 2016

Placental expression of estrogen receptor beta and its hormone binding variant--comparison with estrogen receptor alpha and a role for estrogen receptors in asymmetric division and differentiation of estrogen-dependent cells. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1: 36, 2003

Gene expression profiles with activation of the estrogen receptor alpha-selective estrogen receptor modulator complex in breast cancer cells expressing wild-type estrogen receptor. Cancer Research 62(15): 4419-4426, 2002

Role of the two activating domains of the estrogen receptor in the cell type and promoter context dependent agonistic activity of the anti estrogen 4 hydroxytamoxifen. EMBO (European Molecular Biology Organization) Journal 9(9): 2811-2818, 1990

Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid gamma-linolenic acid (18:3n-6) is a selective estrogen-response modulator in human breast cancer cells: gamma-linolenic acid antagonizes estrogen receptor-dependent transcriptional activity, transcriptionally represses estrogen receptor expression and synergistically enhances tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 (Faslodex) efficacy in human breast cancer cells. International Journal of Cancer 109(6): 949-954, 2004

Estrogen and the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) protection against cell death in estrogen receptor alpha and beta expressing U2OS cells. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 289(1-2): 38-48, 2008

Estrogen and anti estrogen effects on progesterone receptor levels in human mammary carcinoma cells cama 1. Federation Proceedings 39(6): ABSTRACT 2777, 1980

Co-expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and targets of estrogen receptor action in proliferating monkey mammary epithelial cells. Breast Cancer Research 8(1): R10, 2006

Estrogen stimulated migration and invasion of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells involves an ezrin-dependent crosstalk between G protein-coupled receptor 30 and estrogen receptor beta signaling. Steroids 111: 113-120, 2016