EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
54,215,046
Abstracts:
30,230,908
PMIDs:
28,215,208
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Distribution of pollinating entomofauna on rapeseed (Brassica napus L) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.) flowers: The effect of turnip rape's apetalous character



Distribution of pollinating entomofauna on rapeseed (Brassica napus L) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.) flowers: The effect of turnip rape's apetalous character



Apidologie 25(1): 12-20



Foraging behavior and spatial distribution of insect pollinators depend on numerous parameters such as attractivity factors (nectar, flowers, color, aroma). Morphological modifications in flowers could induce changes in attractiveness to pollinators. An apetalous turnip rape was compared to rapeseed (var Hokkaido and Samourai) and also turnip rape (var Chicon) varieties with well-developed petals. Comparisons were carried out on flowering and pollinating entomofauna.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 008491868

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Distribution of the pollinating insect fauna on flowers of rape (Brassica napus) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris): effects of turnip rape's apetalous characteristic. Apidologie 25(1): 12-20, 1994

Distribution of pollinating entomofauna on rapeseed and turnip rape flowers The effect of turnip rapes apetalous character. Apidologie 25(1): 12-20, 1994

Experiments with nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and lime to rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Forskning og Forsoek i Landbruket 24(6): 699-713, 1973

Breeding for improved oil and meal quality in swede rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Sveriges Utsadesforenings Tidskrift 87(5/6): 263-279, 1977

Breeding for improved oil and meal quality in rape brassica napus and turnip rape brassica campestris. Hereditas (Lund) 87(2): 205-218, 1977

Research for improving oil and meal quality of rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Tidskrift 7 (5 6) 263-279, 1977

Breeding for improved oil and meal quality in rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Hereditas 87(2): 205-218, 1977

The pollination requirements of swede rape brassica napus and of turnip rape brassica campestris. Journal of Agricultural Science 91(2): 343-348, 1978

The pollination requirements of swede rape (Brassica napus L.) and of turnip rape (Brassica campestris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, UK 91(2): 343-348, 1978

Forage dry matter accumulation and quality of turnip brassica rapa swede rape brassica napus chinese cabbage brassica campestris hybrids and kale brassica oleracea in the eastern usa. Agronomy Journal 78(2): 245-253, 1986

Prevalence of a highly virulent strain of leptosphaeria maculans blackleg in seed samples of rape brassica napus and turnip rape brassica campestris produced in western canada in 1976 and 1977. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59(3): 899-902, 1979

Interspecific hybrids between forage rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip (Brassica campestris L. spp. rapifera) as alternatives to forage rape. 1. An exploratory study with single pair crosses. Euphytica 22(3): 495-499, 1973

Interspecific hybrids between forage rape brassica napus and turnip brassica campestris ssp rapifera as alternatives to forage rape part 1 an exploratory study with single pair crosses. Euphytica 22(3): 495-499, 1973

Alternaria brassicae (Berk.) Sacc. on rape (Brassica napus L. subsp. oleifera DC.) and turnip rape (Brassica campestris L. var. oleifera DC.). Informatore Fitopatologico 35(11): 43-44, 1985

Effect of a turnip rape (Brassica rapa) trap crop on stem-mining pests and their parasitoids in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). BioControl 50(1): 69-86, 2005