+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film



Endodontic working length assessment: Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film



Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 85(3): 325-328



Objective. This study compared the difference in interpretation of the position of endodontic file tips between two imaging systems: photostimulable storage phosphor luminescence imaging versus radiographic film. Study design. Thirteen patients were selected at random. Preoperative and trial file length radiographs were made with a dual image receptor composed of a Digora Digital Imaging Plate and a piece of Ektaspeed Plus film. Exposure techniques for E-speed film were used. Root length and file length measurements were made from digital images with the Digora system's measuring tools. Measurements were also made on radiographic film with a 7X measuring magnifier. Root length, file length, and their difference were compared for both film and digital images. Results. Differences were found to be less in digital than in film images. Photostimulable storage phosphor luminescence imaging performed similarly to Ektaspeed Plus film for measuring root lengths, but file tip positions (especially of small file sizes) were difficult to visualize with E-speed film. Conclusions. The smaller difference between file tip and root apex found with digital imaging suggests that this technique is more accurate to assess trial file length. This imaging modality for assessing file positions during root canal treatment may be beneficial to the practitioner.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008601770

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9540092

DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90017-8


Related references

Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Radiographics 18(3): 745-754, 1998

Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 106(4): 604-608, 2008

Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems. Radiology 186(2): 387-393, 1993

Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 6(3): 167-172, 1996

Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length. International Endodontic Journal 44(5): 469-473, 2011

Establishing endodontic working length: a comparison of radiographic and electronic methods. New Zealand Dental Journal 81(365): 93-96, 1985

Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease. Radiology 174(1): 207-210, 1990

Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film. General Dentistry 44(6): 532-537, 1996

Comparison of Digital Radiography, Conventional Film and Self-Developing Film for Working Length Determination. Iranian Endodontic Journal 13(3): 381-384, 2018

Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 25(4): 202-206, 1996

Comparison of digital dental X-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination. Journal of Endodontics 26(2): 65-67, 2000

Comparison between PAI and quantitative digital radiographic assessment of apical healing after endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 92(1): 108-115, 2001

Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment. Journal of Applied Oral Science 16(2): 167-170, 2009

Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. International Endodontic Journal 25(6): 279-287, 1992

Comparison of the reproducibility of storage phosphor and film bitewings for assessment of alveolar bone loss. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 66(6): 380-384, 2008