+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Exploratory analysis of multiple sequence alignments using phylogenies

Exploratory analysis of multiple sequence alignments using phylogenies

Computer Applications in the Biosciences 10(3): 243-247

The significance of an alignment between two sequences can be determined using well-known techniques but cannot be easily evaluated with multiple alignments due to the computational complexity. Therefore multiple alignment algorithms may produce an alignment between sequences even when they have little homology with other sequences. A program is presented that makes use of a phylogeny to explore the implications of an alignment. Using the phylogeny, branch lengths are inferred and a search is conducted for regions of unusually rapid or slow rates of change given the observed rates in the rest of the sequence. A very rapid rate of change can be due to either poor homology or due to rapid divergence because of selection. Phylogenies are calculated using either the neighbor joining algorithm of Saitou and Nei (Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406-425, 1987) or a phylogeny supplied by the user. The program also permits randomization of subsections of the sequences to determine the significance of the multiple alignment for these individual regions. The combination of these two simple methods permits rapid and interactive exploration of multiple sequence alignments.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008654574

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7922679

DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.3.243

Related references

Exploratory visual analysis of conserved domains on multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Bioinformatics 10 Suppl 11(): S7-S7, 2010

Advantages of using multiple sequence alignments over pairwise alignments when sequence similarity is low. Abstracts of Papers American Chemical Society 203(1-3): BIOL60, 1992

Sequence Diversity Diagram for comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Proceedings 8(Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Symposium on Biologica): S9-S9, 2014

Building multiple sequence alignments with a flavor of HSSP alignments. Genetics and Molecular Research 5(1): 127-137, 2006

Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56(4): 564-577, 2007

Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. Journal of Molecular Biology 264(4): 823-838, 1996

ESPript: Analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 15(4): 305-308, April, 1999

Creation and analysis of protein multiple sequence alignments. Methods of Biochemical Analysis 43: 215-232, 2001

A comparative analysis of multiple sequence alignments for biological data. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 26 Suppl 1: S1781-9, 2016

Analysis of multiple genomic sequence alignments: a web resource, online tools, and lessons learned from analysis of mammalian SCL loci. Genome Research 14(2): 313-318, 2004

Consistency analysis of similarity between multiple alignments: prediction of protein function and fold structure from analysis of local sequence motifs. Journal of Molecular Biology 307(3): 939-949, 2001

MergeAlign: improving multiple sequence alignment performance by dynamic reconstruction of consensus multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Bioinformatics 13(): 117-117, 2012

ALVIS: interactive non-aggregative visualization and explorative analysis of multiple sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Research 44(8): E77-E77, 2016

Multidimensional mutual information methods for the analysis of covariation in multiple sequence alignments. Bmc Bioinformatics 15(): 157-157, 2014