EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis



Interobserver variation in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis



Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 28(2): 119-125



The interobserver variation among three experienced endoscopists in the endoscopic diagnosis and grading of reflux esophagitis was investigated in 150 dyspeptic patients. The interobserver variation was analyzed with kappa statistics to correct for the extent of agreement expected by chance alone. The observers diagnosed esophagitis in 22.7%, 32.7%, and 35.3% of the patients, respectively (p < 0.0002). Kappa values for grade-1 esophagitis varied from 0.34 to 0.47, a level generally considered to signify poor agreement, and despite partial agreement on the diagnosis in the individual patient there was almost complete disagreement on the features used to characterize grade 1. Kappa values for diagnosing erosive esophagitis (grades 2-4) were 0.68-0.79. Considering all three observers and all grades of esophagitis (grades 0-4) the overall chance-corrected agreement was 0.55. In patients with low-grade esophagitis without reflux-like dyspepsia and when the observers expressed uncertainty in the diagnosis, the agreement rates were particularly poor. Due to a large chance-corrected interobserver variation, the endoscopic diagnosis grade 1 esophagitis is not reliable and thus may be problematic as a selection criterion for clinical trials. Interobserver variation on the presence of erosive/ulcerative esophagitis is acceptable and comparable to the level for peptic ulcer.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008901015

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8441905

DOI: 10.3109/00365529309096057



Related references

Interobserver variability in the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 102(4 PART 2): A46, 1992

Interobserver agreement on endoscopic diagnosis of low-grade reflux esophagitis, including minimal changes. Esophagus 9(1): 9-16, 2012

Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Diseases of the Esophagus 21(4): 355-363, 2008

Correlation between endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis and esophageal motor activity comparison of reflux esophagitis in progressive systemic sclerosis and hiatal hernia cases. Gastroenterological Endoscopy 33(3): 465-477, 1991

Endoscopic reflux esophagitis is attributed to histological esophagitis, but inflammatory changes do not always contribute to reflux symptoms. Gastroenterology 118(4 Suppl 2 Part 2): AGA A1257, April, 2000

Endoscopic differential diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Stomach & Intestine (Tokyo) 18(11): 1167-1173, 1983

Endoscopic diagnosis and classification of reflux esophagitis: are we there yet?. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 56(5): 775-778, 2002

Diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of reflux esophagitis. Khirurgiia: 35-41, 1989

Endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis by the dye-spraying method. Endoscopy 21(1): 1-6, 1989

The endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis: the value of color endoscopy. Minerva Chirurgica 47(7): 617-619, 1992

Criteria of the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of esophagitis of alkaline reflux. Minerva Chirurgica 38(20): 1713-1715, 1983

Is esophagus and stomach biopsy mandatory in endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 121(16): 540-540, 1996

Are biopsies of the esophagus and stomach to be recommended during the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis?. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 121(28-29): 929-929, 1996

Diagnosis of chronic reflux esophagitis. Role of endoscopic and histological examination. Minerva Medica 70(6): 465-471, 1979

Long-term use of acid-suppressive therapy after the endoscopic diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Diseases of the Esophagus 13(4): 271-274, 2001