+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Lactogenic immunity and milk antibody isotypes to transmissible gastroenteritis virus in sows exposed to porcine respiratory coronavirus during pregnancy



Lactogenic immunity and milk antibody isotypes to transmissible gastroenteritis virus in sows exposed to porcine respiratory coronavirus during pregnancy



American Journal of Veterinary Research 56(6): 739-748



Passive protection provided by sows inoculated with the virulent Miller strain of transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), or the ISU-1 strain of porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV), or both was evaluated in nursing pigs challenge exposed with virulent TGEV. Four sows (group B) were inoculated with PRCV oro-nasally twice at 4 and 2 weeks before parturition; 1 sow (group C) was inoculated similarly, but in 2 subsequent pregnancies; and 2 sows (group D) were oronasally primed with PRCV at 4 weeks before parturition, and 2 weeks later were administered a booster inoculation of virulent TGEV. Two additional sows (group E) remained uninoculated and served as seronegative controls, and 1 sow (group A) that had been naturally infected with TGEV served as a seropositive control. The degree of passive immunity transferred by these sows to their litters was assessed by challenge exposing the pigs of sows in groups BE (only the second litter of group C) with virulent TGEV at 3 to 5 days of age. After challenge exposure, clinical signs of infection and mortality were noted and fecal and nasal shedding of virus was assessed by ELISA. The IgA, IgG, and IgM antibody titers to TGEV were quantified in colostrum and milk of the sows by use of an isotype-specific monoclonal antibody-capture ELISA, using biotinylated monoclonal antibodies against each porcine isotype as detecting reagents. A plaque-reduction assay was used to quantify neutralizing antibody titers in serum, colostrum, milk, and fractionated whey (IgG and IgA/ IgM). In the sow naturally infected with TGEV (group A), there was a pronounced decrease in IgG antibody titers to TGEV in the transition from colostrum to milk, and IgA TGEV antibodies became predominant, with high titers maintained throughout lactation. The 4 group-B sows partially protected their pigs after TGEV challenge exposure; mean mortality was 67%, compared with 100% in pigs suckling the 2 TGEV seronegative control sows (group-E litters). Although IgA TGEV antibodies were detected in colostrum and milk of group-B sows, IgG TGEV antibodies were the most abundant. The sow of group C had a marked increase in IgA TGEV antibody titers in colostrum and milk after reinoculation with PRCV during the second pregnancy, before TGEV challenge exposure of the litter. Its pigs were passively protected to a high degree after TGEV challenge exposure (27% litter mortality). The sows in group D, primed with PRCV and boosted with TGEV, provided the best passive protection after TGEV challenge exposure of their pigs. Not only litter mortality (27%) but also morbidity was reduced, compared with those factors for the other challenge-exposed litters, and the sows did not become ill. In these swine, the high degree of passive protection observed could not be associated with the presence of only IgA TGEV antibodies in the milk, but high IgM TGEV antibody titers also were detected in colostrum and milk. Results of this study suggest that PRCV-inoculated sows are able to partially protect their pigs from TGEV challenge exposure and, on the basis of preliminary data, the degree of protection may increase after multiple PRCV exposures or after secondary exposure to TGEV during pregnancy. Also, an IgA respiratory tract-mammary gland link may exist as evident by the low titer of IgA TGEV antibodies in the milk of PRCV-inoculated sows, but may not be as efficient in inducing lactogenic IgA immunity as is the gastrointestinal tract-mammary gland link.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 008942409

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 7653882


Related references

Natural infection with the porcine respiratory coronavirus induces protective lactogenic immunity against transmissible gastroenteritis. Veterinary Microbiology 21(1): 1-8, 1989

Sows infected in pregnancy with porcine respiratory coronavirus show no evidence of protecting their sucking piglets against transmissible gastroenteritis. Veterinary Research Communications 14(4): 329-337, 1990

Immunity to transmissible gastroenteritis virus and porcine respiratory coronavirus infections in swine. Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 43(1-3): 89-97, 1994

Cellular immune responses of pigs after primary inoculation with porcine respiratory coronavirus or transmissible gastroenteritis virus and challenge with transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 48(1-2): 35-54, 1995

Induction of protective immunity against transmissible gastroenteritis virus after exposure of neonatal pigs to porcine respiratory coronavirus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57(2): 157-162, 1996

Characterization of the IgA and subclass IgG responses to neutralizing epitopes after infection of pregnant sows with the transmissible gastroenteritis virus or the antigenically related porcine respiratory coronavirus. Journal of General Virology 75: 2585-2593, 1994

Contribution of passive immunity to porcine respiratory coronavirus to protection against transmissible gastroenteritis virus challenge exposure in suckling pigs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 57(5): 664-671, 1996

Comparison of the antibody response to transmissible gastroenteritis virus and porcine respiratory coronavirus, using monoclonal antibodies to antigenic sites A and X of the S glycoprotein. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53(2): 184-190, 1992

Clinical evaluation of transmissible gastroenteritis virus vaccines and vaccination procedures for inducing lactogenic immunity in sows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 50(1): 111-118, 1989

Lactogenic immunity in transmissible gastroenteritis of swine: pregnant sows sensitized with inactivated virus and then vaccinated intramuscularly with live attenuated virus. Journal of the Chinese Society of Veterinary Science 7(2): 145-152, 1981

Lactogenic immunity to transmissible gastroenteritis (TGE) of swine induced by the attenuated Nouzilly strain of TGE virus: passive protection of piglets and detection of serum and milk antibody classes by ELISA. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 24(1): 37-47, 1990

Isotype-specific antibody-secreting cells to transmissible gastroenteritis virus and porcine respiratory coronavirus in gut- and bronchus-associated lymphoid tissues of suckling pigs. Journal of Immunology 150(9): 3990-4000, 1993

Induction of lactogenic immunity to transmissible gastroenteritis virus of swine using an attenuated coronavirus mutant able to survive in the physicochemical environment of the digestive tract. Veterinary Microbiology 26(3): 227-239, 1991

Antibody response to transmissible gastroenteritis virus and/or porcine respiratory coronavirus in TGEV-immune or PRCV-immune pigs. Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology 35(SUPPL ): 101-102, 1993