EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction



Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction



Neuropsychologia 32(1): 105-124



Function words, content words and pronounceable non-words (pseudowords) were presented tachistoscopically either in the left or the right visual field or with identical copies flashed simultaneously to both visual half-fields. Consistent with earlier studies (10), function words were found to show a right visual field advantage, whereas for content words the right visual field advantage was absent. Compared to either of the unilateral modes of presentation, bilateral presentation of identical word stimuli improved accuracy and latency significantly. The bilateral (Bi) advantage was largest for content words, and was also highly significant for function words in both latency and accuracy. The Bi gain was absent for non-words (significant interaction of Wordness times Visual Field). These results indicate that the lexicons of the left and right hemisphere can "collaborate" rather than inhibit each other or act independently when processing the same linguistic stimuli. Our findings are consistent with the view that the neuronal counterparts of words are Hebbian cell assemblies consisting of strongly connected excitatory neurons of both hemispheres. Since function words show a right visual field advantage in addition to their Bi gain, their assemblies are likely to have most of their neurons located in the left hemisphere. Neuronal assemblies corresponding to content words may be less strongly lateralized.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 008953756

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8818159

DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90073-6



Related references

Lexical priming of function words and content words with children who do, and do not, stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders 41(6): 459-484, 2008

Lexical decision and naming times of young disabled readers with function and content words. Australian Journal of Psychology 40(1): 11-18, 1988

Right words and left words: electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 8(3): 373-392, 1999

(Non)words, (non)words, (non)words: evidence for a protolexicon during the first year of life. Developmental Science 16(1): 24-34, 2013

Exchange of disfluency with age from function words to content words in spanish speakers who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46(3): 754-765, 2003

Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations. Memory & Cognition 28(7): 1098-1108, 2000

Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42(2): 345-354, 1999

The representation of high frequency content words and function words in early and later learnt languages Tests with bilingual aphasic patients. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 24(1-2): 1174, 1998

Automatic conversion from lexical words to prosodic words for. International Journal of Speech Technology 10(1): 45-55, 2007

Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision. Cognitive Processing 15(2): 209-215, 2014

Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year-olds: brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(11): 1785-1802, 2005

Bilateral presentation of words facilitates lexical processing in normals but not in split-brain patients. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 19(1-3): 1808, 1993

There is nothing rotten (with elderly STEMI care) in the (Western) State of Denmark: Polonius: what do you read, my lord? Hamlet: words, words, words. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 81(6): 920-921, 2013

Frequent words do not break continuous flash suppression differently from infrequent or nonexistent words: implications for semantic processing of words in the absence of awareness. Plos One 9(8): E104719-E104719, 2016

Lexical access of function versus content words. Brain and Language 75(3): 376-389, 2000