EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution



Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution



Anesthesia and Analgesia 83(4): 716-720



The safety of lidocaine spinal anesthesia has recently been called into question by reports of both permanent and transient neurologic toxicity. This study explored the possibility of adapting the longer acting spinal bupivacaine to ambulatory surgery. Sixty patients presenting for ambulatory arthroscopy were randomized to four groups receiving the following spinal anesthetics: Group I (15 mg bupivacaine), 3 mL of 0.5% spinal bupivacaine in 8% dextrose; Group II (10 mg bupivacaine), 2 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine + 1 mL saline; Group III (7.5 mg bupivacaine), 1.5 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine + 1.5 mL saline; Group IV (5 mg bupivacaine), 1 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine + 2 mL saline. Maximum block height was T-5 in Group I versus T-8 in the other groups. Onset times to peak block were similar in all groups and averaged 14 min. Time to two-segment regression, complete regression, micturition, and discharge were significantly reduced from Group I to Group II and from Group II to Group III. Reductions in times between Groups III and IV did not achieve statistical significance. Times from placement of the spinal block until discharge were 471 +- 35, 260 +- 15,202 +- 14, and 181 +- 8 min, respectively, for the four groups. The intensity of motor block decreased significantly from group to group, such that 13 of the 15 patients in Group IV failed to achieve Bromage level 2 or 3. The intensity of sensory block also decreased from group to group with four patients in Group IV having pain intraoperatively that required further treatment. Therefore, Group III provided the optimum combination of adequate depth of anesthesia and rapid recovery. The results of this study indicate that spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose diluted with an equal volume of saline provides an acceptable spinal anesthetic for ambulatory arthroscopy with a recovery profile appropriate to the ambulatory setting.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 009446399

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8831308



Related references

Selective spinal anaesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine and bupivacaine + fentanyl in ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Jpma. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 62(4): 313-318, 2012

The effect of epinephrine on small-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: clinical implications for ambulatory surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 86(5): 973-977, 1998

The effect of impregnated autogenous epidural adipose tissue with bupivacaine, methylprednisolone acetate or normal saline on postoperative radicular and low back pain in lumbar disc surgery under spinal anesthesia; A randomized clinical trial study. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 16(5): 621-626, 2011

The effect of cerebrospinal fluid dilution of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 50(10): 906-909, 1995

Modelling of the optimal bupivacaine dose for spinal anaesthesia in ambulatory surgery based on data from systematic review. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 33(11): 846-852, 2016

Low-dose bupivacaine plus fentanyl for spinal anesthesia during ambulatory inguinal herniorrhaphy: a comparison between 6 mg and 7. 5 mg of bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 47(1): 13-19, 2002

Study of quality and extent of intrathecal bupivacaine block by extradural injection of bupivacaine or normal saline in combined spinal epidural technique. Anesthesia, Essays and Researches 8(1): 54-58, 2014

Epidural bupivacaine for aortic surgery. The effect of dilution on the quality of analgesia. Anaesthesia 49(1): 21-24, 1994

Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl. British Journal of Anaesthesia 106(2): 183-188, 2011

Diastolic wall strain is associated with incident heart failure in African Americans: Insights from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Journal of Cardiology, 2017

The preemptive analgesic effect of intraarticular bupivacaine and morphine after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 92(4): 923-926, 2001

Spinal anesthesia with plain bupivacaine is superior to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lumbar spine surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 78(2 SUPPL ): ABSTRACT S434, 1994

Unilateral spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery: a comparison between hyperbaric bupivacaine and bupivacaine-clonidine combination. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 53(6): 788-793, 2009

Bupivacaine-sufentanil versus bupivacaine-fentanyl in spinal anesthesia of patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 4(2): E12091-E12091, 2014

Hypobaric 0.15% bupivacaine versus hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine for posterior (dorsal) spinal block in outpatient anorectal surgery.. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 56(6): 571-582, 2006