+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Thermal responses and physiological strain in men wearing impermeable and semipermeable protective clothing in the cold

Thermal responses and physiological strain in men wearing impermeable and semipermeable protective clothing in the cold

Ergonomics 40(2): 141-150

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of long term cold exposure on thermal responses and physical performance in men while wearing nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) protective clothing. Six healthy men performed 60 min work/60 min rest cycles during 8 hours at an ambient temperature of -10 degrees C. Work was performed by stepping on a 20 cm high bench 15 times.min-1. Subjects were tested while wearing two different types of NBC clothing: impermeable rubber suit (IP) or semipermeable charcoal impregnated suit (SP) with cold weather underwear layers, as well as rubber gloves, boots and a full-face mask. During the tests oxygen consumption (VO2), rectal (Tre) and skin temperatures and sweat production were measured. Rectal and skin temperatures and body heat content followed the work/rest cycles in both types of NBC clothing. T(re) averaged 37.1 +/- 0.04 and 37.3 +/- 0.1 degrees C for IP and SP (NS), respectively. On average, mean skin temperature (Tsk) was 28.6 +/- 0.2 and 29.7 +/- 0.2 degrees C for IP and SP (p < 0.01), respectively. Finger skin temperature decreased rapidly to below 10 degrees C in both ensembles during the rest periods. During work the finger rewarming rate was 0.49 +/- 0.06 and 0.70 +/- 0.02 degree C.min-1 for IP and SP (p < 0.01), respectively. Decrease in body heat storage (S) during cold exposure was smaller in SP than in IP and S was restored to the level of -0.6 +/- 0.3 and -3.0 +/- 0.6 kJ.kg-1 in SP and IP (p < 0.01), respectively, during the work. Work load, according to VO2 measurements, was 1.5 +/- 0.1 and 1.3 +/- 0.11.min-1 for IP and SP (p < 0.05), respectively. Furthermore, during rest VO2 was 30% (p < 0.001) higher in IP than in SP. In conclusion, both types of NBC protective clothing could be used for long periods in cold conditions at a moderate work load without marked whole body heat debt or heat load. However, peripheral parts of the body experienced a rapid and severe cooling during the rest periods. The semipermeable suit enabled higher body heat storage and faster rewarming of extremities during work than the impermeable suit.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009641198

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9118932

DOI: 10.1080/001401397188260

Related references

Metabolic and thermal responses of men wearing cold protective clothing to various degrees of cold stress. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 39(2): 137-144, 1978

Work tolerance and physiological responses to thermal environment wearing protective NBC clothing. Ergonomics 39(4): 620-633, 1996

Validity of infrared tympanic temperature for the evaluation of heat strain while wearing impermeable protective clothing in hot environments. Industrial Health 49(6): 714-725, 2012

Thermal reaction and manual performance during cold exposure while wearing cold-protective clothing. Ergonomics 26(2): 141-149, 1983

Physiological problems associated with wearing NBC protective clothing during cold weather. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 71(2): 184-189, 2000

Physiological and subjective responses to thermal transients of exercising subjects dressed in cold-protective clothing. European Journal Of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology. 73(6): 573-581, 1996

Perceived exertion is as effective as the perceptual strain index in predicting physiological strain when wearing personal protective clothing. Physiology and Behavior 169: 216-223, 2016

The physiological responses of men wearing chemically impregnated protective clothing in a hot dry climate. Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory 1961: 1-8, 1961

Reduction of isometric muscle endurance after wearing impermeable gas protective clothing. European Journal of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology 53(1): 76-80, 1984

Age-related thermal strain in men while wearing radiation protective clothing during short-term exercise in the heat. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 10(4): 361-367, 2004

Psycho physiological strain caused by wearing the tropical combat protective clothing in operational nbc conditions. Travaux Scientifiques des Chercheurs du Service de Sante des Armees (12): 227-230, 1991

Physiological strain of wearing aluminized protective clothing at rest in young, middle-aged, and older men. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25(2): 195-202, 1999

Comparison of physical, biophysical and physiological methods of evaluating the thermal stress associated with wearing protective clothing. Ergonomics 15(3): 337-342, 1972

Initial heat stress on subsequent responses to cold water immersion while wearing protective clothing. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 83(8): 746-750, 2012

Effects of wearing aircrew protective clothing on physiological and cognitive responses under various ambient conditions. Ergonomics 46(8): 780-799, 2003