+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Trauma triage: A comparison of CRAMS and TRTS in a UK population



Trauma triage: A comparison of CRAMS and TRTS in a UK population



Injury 28(2): 97-101



The CRAMS scale and the Triage Revised Trauma Score (TRTS) were compared to assess their potential use as a prehospital method of activating hospital trauma teams. We studied patients from the resuscitation room of Leeds General Infirmary who had enough data recorded to allow calculation of the admission TRTS and CRAMS scale. Patients were defined as having major injury if they died in hospital, were admitted to the ICU or had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15. Each triage scale was compared by calculating multiple sensitivity/specificity pairs and plotting the results on a receiver operator (ROC) curve. The optimal cut-offs on each scale were compared directly. Ninety-seven (46 per cent) of a total of 213 patients fulfilled the study criteria for major injury. The best cut-off points were a CRAMS of < 9 and a TRTS of < 12. The TRTS was significantly more specific (0.9 versus 0.75) but at a cost of poor sensitivity (0.6 versus 0.69, not significant). The performance of both scales was similar when compared on the ROC curve. CRAMS and the TRTS were unable to identify major injuries in our sample with sensitivity and specificity adequate to support their use as a tool to activate trauma teams in the UK.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009670648

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 9205573

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00170-2


Related references

CRAMS scale: field triage of trauma victims. Annals of Emergency Medicine 11(3): 132-135, 1982

Comparison of prehospital trauma triage instruments in a semirural population. Journal of Emergency Medicine 5(3): 197-208, 1987

Superiority of the champion trauma score over the crams scale in determining which trauma patients need immediate surgery. Journal of Trauma 24(7): 674, 1984

Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and the CRAMS scale for accurately triaging patients to trauma centers. Annals of Emergency Medicine 14(11): 1061-1064, 1985

Refining the trauma triage algorithm at an Australian major trauma centre: derivation and internal validation of a triage risk score. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 40(1): 67-74, 2014

Field trauma triage Will the addition of mechanism of injury criteria to the prehospital index yield a definitive trauma triage tool?. Journal of Trauma 39(1): 176, 1995

The failure of triage criteria to identify geriatric patients with trauma: results from the Florida Trauma Triage Study. Journal of Trauma 40(2): 278-283, 1996

Field trauma triage: combining mechanism of injury with the prehospital index for an improved trauma triage tool. Journal of Trauma 43(2): 283-287, 1997

The CRAMS system of quantitative evaluation in trauma. Revista Medica de Chile 116(3): 238-241, 1988

Prospective evaluation of the CRAMS scale for triaging major trauma. Journal of Trauma 25(3): 188-191, 1985

Evaluation of the Pediatric Trauma Triage Checklist as a prehospital pediatric trauma triage tool for the state of Florida. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 11(1): 20-5; Discussion 25-6, 1995

Triage of elderly trauma patients: a population-based perspective. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 217(4): 569-576, 2013

A comparison of EMT judgment and prehospital trauma triage instruments. Journal of Trauma 31(10): 1369-1375, 1991

Trauma triage--a comparison of the trauma score and the vital signs score. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 56(3): 191-197, 1986