+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED)



Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED)



American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 154(5): 1387-1393



To assess the value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, we prospectively evaluated 890 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Prior to lung scanning, each patient was assigned a clinical probability of pulmonary embolism (very likely, possible, unlikely). Perfusion scans were independently classified as follows: (1) normal, (2) near-normal, (3) abnormal compatible with pulmonary embolism (PE+: single or multiple wedge-shaped perfusion defects), or (4) abnormal not compatible with pulmonary embolism (PE-: perfusion defects other than wedge-shaped). The study design required pulmonary angiography and clinical and scintigraphic follow-up in all patients with abnormal scans. Of 890 scans, 220 were classified as normal/or near-normal and 670 as abnormal. A definitive diagnosis was established in 563 (84%) patients with abnormal scans. The overall prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 39%. Most patients with angiographically proven pulmonary embolism had PE+ scans (sensitivity: 92%). Conversely, most patients without emboli on angiography had PE- scans (specificity: 87%). A PE+ scan associated with a very likely or possible clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism had positive predictive values of 99 and 92%, respectively. A PE- scan paired with an unlikely clinical presentation had a negative predictive value of 97%. Clinical assessment combined with perfusion-scan evaluation established or excluded pulmonary embolism in the majority of patients with abnormal scans. Our data indicate that accurate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is possible by perfusion scanning alone, without ventilation imaging. Combining perfusion scanning with clinical assessment helps to restrict the need for angiography to a minority of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009714181

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8912753

DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912753


Related references

Invasive and noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Preliminary results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Chest 107(1 Suppl.): 33s-38s, 1995

Perfusion lung scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a reappraisal and review of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis methods. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 38(6): 450-461, 2008

Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA 263(20): 2753-2759, 1990

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: lung perfusion scintigraphy and thoracic roentgenography. Comparison of results in 472 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Fortschritte der Medizin 100(4): 136-9 142-5, 1982

Can pulmonary angiography be limited to the most suspicious side if the contralateral side appears normal on the ventilation/perfusion lung scan? Data from PIOPED. Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Chest 110(2): 392-394, 1996

Reliability of perfusion lung scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Results of a 3-year prospective study. European Respiratory Journal 8(Suppl. 19): 176S, 1995

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: correlation of value of perfusion lung scan and pulmonary arteriography in selecting patients for inferior vena cava interruption. American Surgeon 44(3): 137-142, 1978

Triage by perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 42(5 Suppl.): 43P, 2001

Ventilation perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Medicine 14(6 Suppl. 4): 956, 1984

Incidence of pulmonary embolism in a chest hospital in Japan and importance of preoperative perfusion lung imaging in the diagnosis of postoperative pulmonary embolism. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 5(3): 89-95, 1991

Relative risks of anticoagulant treatment of acute pulmonary embolism based on an angiographic diagnosis vs a ventilation/perfusion scan diagnosis. Chest 106(3): 727-730, 1994

Is there still a place for ventilation-perfusion lung scan for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism?. La Revue de Medecine Interne 29(6): 449-451, 2008

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica 104(1): 176-188, 2019

Lung perfusion scan for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Kidney International 31(3): 864, 1987

Is the combined ventilation and perfusion lung scan an advance in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. British Journal of Diseases of the Chest 70(3): 216-217, 1976