+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography

Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography

Journal of the American College of Cardiology 22(4): 1068-1074

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the true total variability of quantitative coronary angiographic measures and their components in the clinical setting. Background: Many studies describe quantitative coronary angiographic variability on the basis of repeated quantitative coronary angiographic measures from the same cineangiogram. Although these studies characterize well the performance of quantitative coronary angiographic analysis methods, they do not include other potentially important sources of variability in results of this procedure, such as day to day variations in patients and equipment or variability in selection of frames for analysis. Methods: Coronary angiograms from 20 patients who underwent diagnostic angiography followed by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty an average of 2.9 days later were reviewed. A total of 30 lesions well visualized in both films were analyzed multiple times using an automated first-derivative edgedetection quantitative coronary angiographic technique. Results: The coefficient of variation for quantitative coronary angiographic measures of the same lesions from separate angiograms ranged from 8.11% to 14.01%. Average diameter was the least variable and percent diameter stenosis the most variable. Day to day variations in the patient, procedure and equipment accounted for an average of 30% of the total variability. Of the remaining variability, only 13.26% was due to variability in frame selection. Conclusions: These results provide useful information for planning clinical studies using quantitative coronary angiography, identify areas where additional improvements in this technology are needed and define more clearly the applicability of quantitative coronary angiography in the setting of routine clinical practice.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009714976

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8409042

DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90417-y

Related references

Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 34(5): 652-659, 2010

In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 28(6): 1315-1327, 2013

Coronary CT Angiography in Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Improvement of Coronary Lumen Visualization and Coronary Stenosis Assessment With Image Postprocessing Methods. Medicine 94(48): E2148-E2148, 2016

Coronary CT angiography in calcified coronary plaques: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between bifurcation angle measurement and coronary lumen assessment for diagnosing significant coronary stenosis. International Journal of Cardiology 203(): 78-86, 2016

Coronary lumen quantification at 6 month follow-up of the new radiopaque cordis stent An experimental and clinical study using geometric quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary ultrasound. Circulation 92(8 SUPPL ): I328, 1995

The double helix angiography of right coronary arteries: false lumen stenting of a type F right coronary artery spiral dissection with late recanalization of the true lumen and occlusion of the stented false lumen. Heart International 9(1): 26-29, 2014

Optimizing image contrast display improves quantitative stenosis measurement in heavily calcified coronary arterial segments on coronary CT angiography: A proof-of-concept and comparison to quantitative invasive coronary angiography. Academic Radiology 21(6): 797-804, 2015

Comparison of two dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (2D-QCA) with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the assessment of coronary artery lesion dimensions. International Journal of Cardiology. Heart & Vasculature 7: 14-17, 2015

Overestimation of acute lumen gain and late lumen loss by quantitative coronary angiography (compared with intravascular ultrasound) in stented lesions. American Journal of Cardiology 80(10): 1277-1281, 1997

Distal coronary flow reserve after balloon angioplasty in relation to arterial dimensions assessed by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. European Heart Journal 16(ABSTR SUPPL ): 297, 1995

Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. American Journal of Cardiology 60(1): 55-60, 1987

Impact of coronary lumen reconstruction on the estimation of endothelial shear stress: in vivo comparison of three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional fusion combining optical coherent tomography. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 19(10): 1134-1141, 2017

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography in quantitation of coronary dimensions and stenoses on man impact of lumen eccentricity. Circulation 82(4 SUPPL 3): III440, 1990

Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 27(5): 647-656, 2011

Elongated eccentric soft coronary plaque: major diagnostic pitfall on quantitative coronary angiography overpowered by computed tomography coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Australasian Radiology 50(3): 267-270, 2006