+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Electrostatic precipitator as a generator rather than a remover of small droplets



Electrostatic precipitator as a generator rather than a remover of small droplets



Environmental Science and Technology 33(24): 92-4



The electrostatic precipitator (ESP) is used all over the world to clean particles from contaminated industrial and domestical air. Recent observations and experiments however are disturbing. These indicate that, when capturing an oil mist or possibly droplets in general, phenomena occur that can cause the ESP to generate rather than remove (sub)micron particles. At spots where the electric field strength is high enough, collected droplets deform into a conical shape, the so-called Taylor cone. At the tip of this cone a jet is formed that breaks up in an enormous number of (sub)micron-sized droplets. In the ESP, this occurs at the charging corona wires and at sharp points on the collector plates. Because a part of the ESP energy is thus being used to spray droplets electrically, less energy can be utilized for ionization to charge incoming particles. Simultaneously, the active field strength between the collector plates decreases. These factors result in a substantial decrease in collection efficiency over the total size range. In addition to this over all decrease in efficiency, particles in the order of 1 mm are generated from the tip of the developed Taylor cones. Most of these generated droplets will be trapped in the ESP, but droplets formed close to the exit of the plates, depending on the configuration of the ESP, will be discharged from the precipitator. Thus, for particles of this size, the ESP is a particle generator rather than a particle remover. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009835092

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1021/es990093o


Related references

Study on leadbismuth droplets' generation and their removal by an electrostatic precipitator. Progress in Nuclear Energy 50(2-6): 582-586, 2008

Integrated Electrostatic Precipitator for Small-Scaled Biomass Boilers. Chemical Engineering & Technology 40(2): 278-288, 2017

Design and characterisation of an electrostatic precipitator for small heating appliances. Journal of Electrostatics 63(2): 85-100, 2005

Electrostatic field calculation using R-functions and the method of characteristics in electrostatic precipitator. Journal of Electrostatics 38(4): 269-282, 1996

Electrostatic field and charge distribution in small charged dielectric droplets. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6(4): 383-393, 2004

A high-volume spray aerosol generator producing small droplets for low pressure applications. Journal of Aerosol Science 26(7): 1131-1138, 1995

Deposition patterns of small droplets applied to a tomato crop using the Ulvafan and two protoype electrostatic sprayers. Crop Protection 5(5): 358-364, 1986

Deposition patterns of small droplets applied to a tomato crop using the ulvafan and two prototype electrostatic sprayers. Crop Protection 5(5): 358-364, 1986

An electrostatic fog precipitator. American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 18(3): 253-260, 1957

A smoke remover using electrostatic force. Electrical Engineering in Japan 97(6): 91-100, 1977

Improvement of the M. S. A. electrostatic precipitator. Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology 29(6): 400-402, 1947

Electrostatic precipitator for removing SO2. Official Gazette of the United States Patent & Trademark Office Patents 1251(3), 2001

A portable electrostatic precipitator. Jour Indust Hyg And Toxicol 25(4): 152-156, 1943

Novel electrodes of an electrostatic precipitator for air filtration. Journal of Electrostatics 73: 117-124, 2015

Electrostatic Precipitator Efficiency Calculations. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 28(12): 1228-1229, 1978