+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Extending production models to include process error in the population dynamics

Extending production models to include process error in the population dynamics

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences ober; 60(10): 1217-1228

Four methods for fitting production models, including three that account for the effects of error in the population dynamics equation (process error) and when indexing the population (observation error), are evaluated by means of Monte Carlo simulation. An estimator that represents the distributions of biomass explicitly and integrates over the unknown process errors numerically (the NISS estimator) performs best of the four estimators considered, never being the worst estimator and often being the best in terms of the medians of the absolute values of the relative errors. The total-error approach outperforms the observation-error estimator conventionally used to fit dynamic production models, and the performance of a Kalman filter based estimator is particularly poor. Although the NISS estimator is the best-performing estimator considered, its estimates of quantities of management interest are severely biased and highly imprecise for some of the scenarios considered.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 009846477

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1139/f03-105

Related references

Extending in Silico Protein Target Prediction Models to Include Functional Effects. Frontiers in Pharmacology 9: 613-613, 2018

Extending functional response models to include a second prey type: an experimental test. Ecology (Washington D C): 684: 900-912, 1987

Fitting nonlinear population models to data with both process and measurement error. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts 88: 232, 2003

Fitting population models incorporating process noise and observation error. Ecological Monographs ruary; 72(1): 57-76, 2002

Extending functional response models to include a secondary prey type an experimental test. Ecology (Washington D C) 68(4): 900-912, 1987

Extending the stochastic two-stage model of carcinogenesis to include self-regulation of the nonmalignant cell population. Risk Analysis 12(1): 129-138, 1992

Accounting for demographic and environmental stochasticity, observation error, and parameter uncertainty in fish population dynamics models. North American Journal of Fisheries Management ust; 26(3): 685-701, 2006

Hidden process models for animal population dynamics. Ecological Applications 16(1): 74-86, 2006

Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models extending observation error. Journal of Hydrology 367(1-2): 93-103, 2009

Process-based models of Mediterranean forest production and dynamics. Investigacion Agraria, Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 14(3): 482-496, 2005

When should plant population models include age structure?. Journal of Ecology 102(2): 531-543, 2014

A comparison of statistical tests distinguishing error dynamics and systematic dynamics in distributed lag models. Technical Bulletin Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station ( 167): 41pp., 1990

A multiscale maximum entropy moment closure for locally regulated space-time point process models of population dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Biology 62(5): 605-653, 2011

Review of Methods for Fitting Time-series Models with Process and Observation Error and Likelihood Calculations for Nonlinear, Non-Gaussian State-space Models. Bulletin of: 5-71, 2002

Realistic population dynamics in epidemiological models: the impact of population decline on the dynamics of childhood infectious diseases. Measles in Italy as an example. Mathematical Biosciences 192(2): 153-175, 2005