+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Turtle excluder devices- Are the escape openings large enough?

Turtle excluder devices- Are the escape openings large enough?

Fishery Bulletin 100(3): 6-74

All five species of sea turtles in continental U.S. waters are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the population sizes of all species remain well below historic levels. Shrimp trawling was determined to be the largest source of anthropogenic mortality of many of the species. As a mechanism to reduce the incidental catch of turtles in trawl nets, turtle excluder devices have been required intermittently in the shrimp fishery since 1987, and at all times since 1994. The expanded turtle excluder device (TED) regulations, implemented in 1994, were expected to reduce shrimp trawl capture of sea turtles by 97[percent]. Recent evidence has indicated that the sizes of turtles stranding were not representative of the animals subjected to being captured by the shrimp trawlers. The purpose of our study was to compare the sizes of stranded sea turtles with the size of the TED openings. We compared the sizes of stranded loggerhead (Caretta caretta), green (Chelonia mydas), and Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii) sea turtles, the three species most commonly found stranded, to the minimum widths and heights of TED openings. We found that annually a large proportion of stranded loggerhead turtles (33-47[percent]) and a small proportion of stranded green turtles (1-7[percent]) are too large to fit through the required minimum-size TED openings. The continued high mortality of sea turtles caused by bottom trawling is reason for concern, especially for the northern subpopulation of loggerhead turtles, which currently is not projected to achieve the federal recovery goal of reaching and maintaining prelisting levels of nesting. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 010022110

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Predicting the impact of turtle excluder devices on loggerhead sea turtle populations. Ecological Applications 4(3): 437-445, 1994

Effects of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) on loggerhead sea turtle strandings with implications for conservation. Copeia. December 21; 4: 773-779, 1995

The impact of turtle excluder devices and bycatch reduction devices on diverse tropical marine communities in Australia's northern prawn trawl fishery. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam). November; 812-3: 176-188, 2006

Fisheries-related mortality and turtle excluder devices (TEDs). Unknown, 2003

Use of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) on commercial shrimp trawlers: should they be required?. Bulletin of the Chicago Herpetological Society, 256: 104-106, 1990

Development of turtle excluder devices (TEDS) and their potential applicability to ASEAN nations. Unknown, 2000

Shrimp loss associated with turtle excluder devices: Are the historical estimates statistically biased?. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28(1): 203-211, 2008

Conservation and forced innovation: responses to turtle excluder devices among Gulf of Mexico shrimpers. Human Organization 53(2): 160-166, 1994

The Impact of Turtle Excluder Devices and Fisheries Closures on Loggerhead and Kemp's Ridley Strandings in the Western Gulf of Mexico. Conservation Biology 17(4): 89-97, 2003

Validating ecological risk assessments for fisheries: assessing the impacts of turtle excluder devices on elasmobranch bycatch populations in an Australian trawl fishery. Marine and Freshwater Research, 574: 395-401, 2006

Loss of shrimp by Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) in coastal waters of the United States, North Carolina to Texas: March 1988-August 1990. U S National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 91(1): 129-137, 1993

Turtle excluder devices: good for sea turtles, good for people, and good for business. Unknown, 2000

Using Sea Turtle Carcasses to Assess the Conservation Potential of a Turtle Excluder Dredge. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30(4): 993-1000, 2010

A review of development, modification and implementation of TED Turtle Excluder Device to reduce sea turtle bycatch in trawl fisheries. FAO Fisheries Reports, 738: 171-177 (Supplement), 2004

Sea turtle excluder device. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 25: 231-232, 1981