+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of physiological responses to two types of particle barrier, vapor permeable clothing ensembles



A comparison of physiological responses to two types of particle barrier, vapor permeable clothing ensembles



American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 60(4): 495-501



Chemical protective clothing (PC) use while working results in elevated rectal temperatures (Tre) that limit work time. Particle barrier, vapor permeable (PBVP) PCs allow workers to cool themselves by evaporating some sweat. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects on worker productivity of two types of PBVP suits, a Kleenguard (PPPC) (Kimberly Clark), and a Tyvek (PEPC) (DuPont) suit. Fifteen males in a repeated measures design performed four work tests consisting of a walk/arm curl combination at a time-weighted work rate of 1.0 L/min (300 kcal/hr), two in a wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) of 26 degrees C and two in a WBGT of 18 degrees C, with subjects wearing each suit once in each environment. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between the suits at 18 degrees C WBGT, but a significant difference was found (p < 0.05) between the suits, with the PPPC having a lower Tre in the WBGT = 26 degrees C at the 80th, 100th, and 120th min. A significant difference (p < .05) was also seen in the 26 degrees C WBGT with the PPPC resulting in a lower heart rate (HR) at the 40th, 60th, 80th, 100th, and 120th min and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) at the 75th, 90th, and 120th min. Additionally, a significant difference (p < .05) was seen between PEPC and PPPC for Tre, delta Tre, mean skin temp (mTsk), delta mTsk, and HR, each regressed against time in the 26 degrees C WBGT. Twelve of the 15 subjects also reported feeling cooler in the PPPC versus the PEPC in either WBGT environment.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010055520

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10462783

DOI: 10.1080/00028899908984470


Related references

Physiological evaluation of liquid-barrier, vapor-permeable protective clothing ensembles for work in hot environments. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 54(7): 397-402, 1993

Gender differences in physiological and psychological responses to the thermal environment with varying clothing ensembles. Building and Environment 141: 45-54, 2018

Physiological Effects on Work Performance of Vapor-Barrier Clothing and Full-Face Respirator. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 20(1): 45-52, 1978

Physiological effects on work performance of vapor barrier clothing and full face respirator. Journal of Occupational Medicine 20(1): 45-52, 1978

Effect of heat stress on physiological factors for industrial workers performing routine work and wearing impermeable vapor-barrier clothing. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 42(2): 97-103, 1981

The effect of air permeability and water vapor permeability of cleanroom clothing on physiological responses and wear comfort. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 11(6): 366-376, 2015

A Novel Adjustable Concept for Permeable Gas/Vapor Protective Clothing: Balancing Protection and Thermal Strain. Annals of Work Exposures and Health 62(2): 232-242, 2018

Effect of different types of clothing on thermoregulatory responses and clothing temperature in man at supine rest. Journal of the Physiological Society of Japan 49(8-9): 576, 1987

Heat acclimatization while wearing vapor-barrier clothing. Aerospace Medicine 44(6): 609-612, 1973

Maximum sustainable work rate for five protective clothing ensembles with respect to moisture vapor transmission rate and air permeability. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 3(2): 80-86, 2006

Cryo-responses of two types of large unilamellar vesicles in the presence of non-permeable or permeable cryoprotecting agents. Cryobiology 57(3): 276-285, 2008

Protection against cold in prehospital care: wet clothing removal or addition of a vapor barrier. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine 26(1): 11-20, 2016

Effect of clothing layers in combination with fire fighting personal protective clothing on physiological and perceptual responses to intermittent work and on materials performance test results. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 10(5): 259-269, 2013

WBGT clothing adjustment factors for four clothing ensembles and the effects of metabolic demands. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 5(1): 1-5; Quiz D21-3, 2007

WBGT clothing adjustments for four clothing ensembles under three relative humidity levels. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2(5): 251-256, 2005