+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy

A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy

Transplantation 67(5): 722-728

Background. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (laparoNx) has the potential to increase living kidney donation rates by reducing the pain and suffering of the donor. However, renal function outcomes of a large series of recipients of laparoNx have not been studied. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 132 recipients of laparoNx done at our center between 3/96 and 11/97 and compared them to 99 recipients of kidneys procured by the open technique (openNx) done between 10/93 and 3/96. Results. Significantly more patients in the laparoNx group (25.2%) were taking tacrolimus within the first month than those in the openNx group (2.1%). Mean serum creatinine was higher in laparoNx compared with openNx at 1 week (2.8+-0.3 and 1.8+-0.2 mg/dl, respectively; P=0.005) and at 1 month (2.0+-0.1 and 1.6+-0.1 mg/dl, P=0.05) after transplant. However, by 3 and 6 months, the mean serum creatinine was similar in the two groups (1.7+-0.1 versus 1.5+-0.05 mg/dl, and 1.7+-0.1 versus 1.7+-0.1, respectively). By 1 year posttransplant, the mean serum creatinine for laparoNx was actually less than that for openNx (1.4+-0.1 and 1.7+-0.1 mg/dl, P=0.03). Although patients in the laparoNx compared to the openNx group were more likely to have delayed graft function (7.6 versus 2.0%) and ureteral complications (4.5 versus 1.0%), the rate of other complications, as well as hospital length of stay, patient and graft survival rates were similar in the two groups. Conclusion. Although laparoNx allografts have slower initial function compared with openNx, there was no significant difference in longer term renal function.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010055607

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10096529

DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00111

Related references

Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 21(2): 472-477, 2006

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65(5): 862-866, 2005

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared to open donor nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 169(4 Suppl.): 469, 2003

Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy has Equivalent Early and Late Renal Function Outcomes Compared With Open Donor Nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 175(1): 236-237, 2006

Comparison of open live donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, and hand-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a cost-minimization analysis. Journal of Surgical Research 176(2): E89-E94, 2012

Early and late recipient graft function and donor outcome after laparoscopic vs open adult live donor nephrectomy for pediatric renal transplantation. Archives of Surgery 137(8): 908, 2002

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 33(1-2): 1106-1107, 2001

Comparison between laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy. Journal of Urology 155(5 Suppl. ): 530A, 1996

Laparoscopic Versus Open Live Donor Nephrectomy in Renal Transplantation. Annals of Surgery 248(4): 692-693, 2008

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy A comparison of donor tolerance and renal allograft outcomes stratified by donor age. Journal of Urology 171(4 Suppl.): 485, 2004

Comparison of renal function recovery in donor and recipient after living donor nephrectomy: Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open procedures. European Urology Suppl.s 7(3): 195, 2008

Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients. Surgical Endoscopy 23(7): 1564-1568, 2009

Open versus laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in live related renal transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings 36(9): 2620-2622, 2004

Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Archives of Surgery 136(8): 897-907, 2001

Outcomes of pediatric living donor renal transplant after laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Transplantation Proceedings 34(8): 3097-3098, 2002