+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Application of adaptive image processing technique to real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging improves image quality



Application of adaptive image processing technique to real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging improves image quality



Investigative Radiology 38(5): 257-262



To assess the impact of adaptive filter postprocessing on quality of ultrasound images. Ultrasound images acquired with real-time spatial compound imaging (SonoCT imaging) were subsequently processed with an adaptive real time algorithm (XRES imaging). Conventional and XRES-processed images from abdominal, pediatric or small parts ultrasound explorations were compared. The delineation of borders, tissue contrast, amount of noise, and overall image quality were evaluated. Delineation of borders and tissue contrast were improved on all images (P < 0.05). The amount of noise was reduced (P < 0.05). The overall image quality was improved for abdominal, pediatric and small parts ultrasound explorations (P < 0.05). No image degradation was found. Adaptive processing provided better image quality without loss of clinically useful information.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010195657

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12750614

DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000057032.41715.14


Related references

Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing. Ultraschall in der Medizin 33(3): 270-274, 2013

Combination of tissue harmonic sonography, real-time spatial compound sonography and adaptive image processing technique for the detection of carotid plaques and intima-medial thickness. European Journal of Radiology 71(1): 11-16, 2009

An Interactive Processing System for Ultrasonic Compound Imaging, Real-Time Image Processing and Textile Analysis. Ultrasonic Imaging 8(2): 131-150, 1986

An interactive processing system for ultrasonic compound imaging, real-time image processing and texture analysis. Ultrasonic Imaging 8(2): 131-150, 1986

Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Seminars in Ultrasound Ct and Mr 22(1): 50-64, 2001

New fusion technique significantly improves image quality and completeness of datasets in real time 3 dimensional echocardiography. 2007

A real time quality control application for animal production by image processing. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 95(14): 2850-2857, 2015

Ultrasound-ultrasound image overlay fusion improves real-time control of radiofrequency ablation margin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. European Radiology 28(5): 1986-1993, 2018

Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 77(5): 328-333, 2019

Real-time 3D echocardiography combined with harmonic imaging and contrast application Will it solve the problem of poor image quality?. Circulation 100(18 Suppl. ): I 356, 1999

Compound image compression for real-time computer screen image transmission. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(8): 993, 2005

A self-adaptive parameter optimization algorithm in a real-time parallel image processing system. Thescientificworldjournal 2013: 978548, 2013

Improving image quality of diagnostic ultrasound by using the safe use time model with the dynamic safety factor and the effect of the exposure time on the image quality. Ultrasonics 52(1): 93, 2012

Real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging of skin. Skin Research and Technology 10(1): 23-31, 2004

Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 28(2): 155-163, 2002