+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Biomechanical analysis of the deadlift during the 1999 Special Olympics World Games

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33(8): 1345-1353
Biomechanical analysis of the deadlift during the 1999 Special Olympics World Games
Purpose: Improper lifting techniques may increase injury risks and decrease performance. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast biomechanical parameters between sumo and conventional style deadlifts and between high- and low-skilled lifters who participated in the powerlifting event during the 1999 Special Olympics World Games. Methods: Two synchronized video cameras collected 60 Hz of data from 40 subjects. Parameters were quantified at barbell liftoff (LO), when the barbell passed the knees (KP), and at lift completion. Results: Compared with the conventional group, the sumo group had a 100% greater stance width, 20% smaller hand width, 10% less vertical bar distance, a more vertical trunk at LO, a more horizontal thigh at LO and KP, a less vertical shank at KP, and greater forefoot abduction. The sumo group generated ankle dorsiflexor, knee extensor, and hip extensor moments, whereas the conventional group produced ankle plantar flexor, knee flexor and extensor, and hip extensor moments. Compared with low-skilled lifters, high-skilled lifters had a 40% greater barbell load, 15% greater stance width (sumo group only), greater knee flexion at LO (conventional group only), greater knee extension at KP, a less vertical shank position at LO (sumo group only), 15% less vertical bar distance, less first peak bar velocity between LO and KP (conventional group only), smaller plantar flexor and hip extensor moment arms at LO and KP, and greater knee extensor moment arms at LO. Conclusions: The sumo deadlift may be more effective in working ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors, whereas the conventional deadlift may be more effective in working ankle plantar flexors and knee flexors. High-skilled lifters exhibited better lifting mechanics than low-skilled lifters by keeping the bar closer to the body, which may both enhance performance and minimize injury risk.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 010245630

PMID: 11474337

DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00016

Related references

Biomechanical analysis of sumo and conventional deadlifts in females during the Special Olympics World Games. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 35(5 Supplement): S322, May, 2003

1999 Special Olympics World Summer Games: dermatologic health screening results. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 44(4): 700-703, 2001

Medical Learning from the Special Olympics World Games 2015. Current Sports Medicine Reports 15(3): 134-139, 2016

Pharmaceutical services at the 1995 Special Olympics World Games. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy 53(18): 2198-2199, 1996

Yale-New Haven Hospital prepares clambake for 10,000 at Special Olympics World Games. Healthcare Foodservice 5(3): 1, 10-1, 10, 1996

Vision profile of the athletes of the 1995 Special Olympics World Summer Games. Journal of the American Optometric Association 68(11): 699-708, 1997

Medical planning for very large events: Special Olympics World Games Los Angeles 2015. Current Sports Medicine Reports 14(3): 161-164, 2016

Hearing screening outcomes for persons with intellectual disability: a preliminary report of findings from the 2005 Special Olympics World Winter Games. International Journal of Audiology 47(7): 399-403, 2008

1983 International Summer Special Olympics Games. Journal of Rehabilitation 49(2): 8, 10, 12-8, 10, 12, 1983

Special issue: The missing Olympics: the 1940 Tokyo Games, Japan, Asia and the Olympic Movement. International Journal of the History of Sport 24(8): 955-1148, 2007