+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Can burrow-nesting seabirds be identified from their burrow dimensions?



Can burrow-nesting seabirds be identified from their burrow dimensions?



Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(3): 586-591



To reduce disturbance, the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge indirectly calculates the densities of burrow-nesting seabirds by counting numbers of small-, medium-, and large-width burrows and assuming that birds occupy burrows equivalent to their body size. Burrow-width criteria that differentiate species are based on data collected in British Columbia, but may not be appropriate for other sites. Our objectives were to evaluate and improve this method at an annual monitoring site on Buldir Island, Alaska. During 1995 and 1996, we measured width and height of 391 burrows and subsequently verified the species occupying each burrow. We found that the current model incorrectly predicted the species in 38% of the burrows. To improve accuracy of the method, we revised the burrow-size criteria based on mean burrow width and height for each species. The revised size classes were correlated significantly with the expected species and predicted the correct species in 80% of the burrows. We then used the revised size criteria to design a measuring device to distinguish between species at the burrow entrance. The improvement in species prediction from the revised size criteria suggests that the measuring device can be used to monitor densities of burrow-nesting seabirds accurately, quickly, and with negligible disturbance at Buldir Island, Alaska.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010270788

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.2307/3783607


Related references

Habitat use and burrow densities of burrow-nesting seabirds on South East Island, Chatham Islands, New Zealand. Notornis 41(Suppl. ): 27-37, 1994

An artificial nest box for burrow-nesting seabirds. Emu 95(4): 290-294, 1995

Use of radar for monitoring colonial burrow-nesting seabirds. Journal of Field Ornithology 70(2): 145-157, 1999

Comparison of survey techniques for burrow-nesting seabirds. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes 151: 1-7, 1985

Recapture processes and biological inference in monitoring burrow-nesting seabirds. Journal of Ornithology 151(1): 133-146, 2010

Improving the accuracy of population size estimates for burrow-nesting seabirds. Ibis 154(3): 0-0, 2012

Estimating colony and breeding population size for nocturnal burrow-nesting seabirds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 454: 83-90, 2012

An Experimental Study of the Use of Social Information by Prospecting Nocturnal Burrow-Nesting Seabirds. Condor 113(3): 572-580, 2011

Norway rats as predators of burrow-nesting seabirds: insights from stable isotope analyses. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1): 25, 1999

The use of knock-down tags to detect changes in occupancy among burrow-nesting seabirds: what is an adequate sample size?. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes 172: 1-4, 1988

Norway rats as predators of burrow-nesting seabirds: Insights from stable isotope analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1): 14-25, 1999

Fiddler Crab Burrow Morphology: How Do Burrow Dimensions and Bioturbative Activities Compare in Sympatric Populations of Uca vocans (Linnaeus, 1758) and U. annulipes (H. Milne Edwards, 1837)?. Crustaceana 79(5): 525-540, 2006

Fiddler crab burrow morphology: How do burrow dimensions and bioturbative activities compare in sympatric populations of Uca vocans (Linnaeus, 1758) and U. annulipes (H. Milne Edwards, 1837)?. Crustaceana (Leiden) 79(5): 525-540, 2006

A Model Approach for Estimating Colony Size, Trends, and Habitat Associations of Burrow-Nesting Seabirds. Condor 115(2): 356-365, 2013

Translocations of eight species of burrow-nesting seabirds genera Pterodroma, Pelecanoides, Pachyptila and Puffinus Family Procellariidae. Biological Conservation 142.10, 2009