+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology



Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology



Ear and Hearing 20(1): 1-11



Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine children's speech recognition abilities for words and sentences presented in background noise when the children used omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Design: Twenty children (ten 4- to 6-yr olds; ten 7- to 11-yr-olds) with bilateral cochlear hearing loss (average four-frequency hearing loss = 57.25 dB BL; range: mild to severe) were included in the study. An adaptive test procedure was used to estimate a signal to noise ratio (SNR) that reduced individual speech recognition ability to 50% in multi-talker background competition. Testing was completed with the child seated in a conventional audiologic test suite. A fixed level of the speech signal was delivered through a loudspeaker located at 0degree; noise varying in 2 dB steps was presented at 180'. SNR was estimated for two types of speech materials (closed-set words and sentences). Children wore binaural programmable hearing aids (Phonak PiCS) and were tested in conventional omni-directional and dual-microphone ("Audio Zoom") conditions. Results: Significant effects of microphone condition, speech material type (words and sentences), and age group ("younger" and "older') were revealed by mixed design analysis of variance. Overall, children received a mean advantage of 4.7 dB from listening in the dual-microphone condition. Children's performance was correlated with their chronological age and language age (receptive vocabulary) but not with their degree of hearing loss (except in one condition). Younger children required a more advantageous SNR to achieve the same performance criteria as older children. Conclusions: Under the specific test conditions used in this investigation, dual-microphone hearing aid technology provided a significant listening advantage in background competition over conventional omni-directional microphones for children with mild to severe cochlear hearing loss for both word and sentence test materials.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010315291

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10037061

DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199902000-00001


Related references

Hearing impaired children's preference for, and performance with, four combinations of directional microphone and digital noise reduction technology. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24(9): 832-844, 2013

Directional microphone in hearing aids. Effects on speech discrimination in noise. Archives of Otolaryngology 101(5): 316-319, 1975

Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11(1): 23-35, 2000

Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391, 2014

Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use hearing aids. American Journal of Audiology 23(2): 201-210, 2014

Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 24(4): 87-92, 1987

Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction. International Journal of Audiology 52(1): 29-36, 2013

The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27(1): 29-41, 2016

Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 6(6): 440-449, 1995

Effects of Noise on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 59(5): 1218-1232, 2016

Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17(7): 519-530, 2006

Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17(3): 179-189, 2006

Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms. Trends in Amplification 8(3): 83, 2004

Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implantees with a two-microphone monaural adaptive noise reduction system. Ear and Hearing 22(5): 420-430, 2001

Comparisons of speech recognition in noise by mildly-to-moderately hearing-impaired children using hearing aids and FM systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 49(4): 409-418, 1984