+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Classification of dyspepsia: Identification of independent symptom components in 7270 consecutive, unselected dyspepsia patients from general practice



Classification of dyspepsia: Identification of independent symptom components in 7270 consecutive, unselected dyspepsia patients from general practice



Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 33(12): 1262-1272



Background: Several attempts to classify dyspepsia into subgroups have been proposed as a basis for empirical treatment and research. However, subgrouping has proved difficult due to overlap of symptoms between subgroups, and the response to empirical therapy is difficult to predict. We aimed to study whether natural symptom combinations occur in patients seeing general practitioners because of dyspepsia and whether symptom presentation could predict the effect of proton pump inhibitor treatment. Methods: The symptom presentation of 7270 consecutive, unselected patients with dyspepsia in general practice was studied by using principal-components analysis. The relation to the effect of omeprazole was studied in a subsample (n= 471) with predominantly reflux-like or ulcer-like dyspepsia being included in a controlled clinical trial of omeprazole versus placebo. Results: Four principal components (factors), explaining 36% of the total variance, were found. They describe four independent dimensions in the symptoms of dyspepsia that can be interpreted meaningfully as representing A) acid-related disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract, B) irritable bowel disorder, C) dysmotility of the stomach/duodenum, and D) dysmotility of the esophagus. In the subsample the response to proton pump inhibition therapy was associated with high component-A scores, low component-B scores, and low component-C scores. A pocket chart was devised to obtain the component scores easily in new patients. Conclusion: The analysis identified four characteristic, biologically meaningful dyspepsia components that express independent dimensions in the symptoms of patients with dyspepsia. The symptom scores corresponding to the four components may improve symptom-based diagnosis and thereby empirical therapy. In particular, the association between component scores and the effect of omeprazole suggests that classifying dyspepsia on the basis of these components may focus empirical omeprazole therapy even more.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010326375

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1080/00365529850172340


Related references

Dyspepsia classification pocket chart based on symptoms in 7270 dyspepsia patients from general practice Evidence for two types of esophageal dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 116(4 PART 2): A80, 1999

Identification of symptom clusters in 7,270 consecutive, unselected dyspepsia patients from general practice. Gastroenterology 110(4 SUPPL ): A28, 1996

Etiology of Dyspepsia: Four hundred unselected consecutive patients in general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 30(6): 519-523, 1995

Prognosis of dyspepsia among patients in general practice Dyspepsia subgroups and patient characteristics. Gastroenterology 110(4 SUPPL ): A29, 1996

Association between dyspepsia and weather An analysis of 7266 dyspepsia patients from general practice. Gastroenterology 118(4 Suppl 2 Part 2): AGA A1090, 2000

Fluctuation in dyspepsia subgroups over time. A three-year follow-up of patients consulting general practice for dyspepsia. Digestive & Liver Disease 34(5): 332-338, 2002

Dyspepsia and Dyspepsia Subgroups in Japan: Symptom Profiles and Experience with Cisapride: General Discussion. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 28(S195): 36-39, 1993

Dyspepsia nonulcerous dyspepsia and nonorganic dyspepsia i. concept classification and clinical manifestations. Revista Espanola de las Enfermedades del Aparato Digestivo 74(3): 285-288, 1988

The Hong Kong index of dyspepsia: A validated symptom severity questionnaire for patients with dyspepsia. Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17(5): 545-551, 2002

Dyspepsia workload in urban general practice and implications of the British Society of Gastroenterology Dyspepsia guidelines (1996). Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 14(4): 413-420, 2000

Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups in Japan: symptom profiles and experience with cisapride. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. Supplement 195: 36-8; Discussion 38-9, 1993

Patient-based assessment in dyspepsia: development and validation of Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI). Digestive Diseases and Sciences 45(6): 1172-1179, 2000

Dyspepsia in 123,610 Danish citizens A one year prospective standardized registration in general practice according to an international classification. Gastroenterology 106(4 SUPPL ): A17, 1994

Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire in dyspepsia: a six-country study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 6: 12, 2008

Functional dyspepsia vs organic disease Evaluation of validity of discriminate symptomatology and classification in dyspepsia subtypes. Gastroenterology 106(4 SUPPL ): A10, 1994