+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment



Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment



Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(4): 45-68



Life-cycle impact assessments (LCIAs) are complex because they almost always involve uncertain consequences relative to multiple criteria. Several authors have noticed that this is precisely the sort of problem addressed by methods of decision analysis. Despite several experiences of using multiple-attribute decision analysis (MADA) methods in LCIA, the possibilities of MADA methods in LCIA are rather poorly elaborated in the field of life-cycle assessment. In this article we provide an overview of the commonly used MADA methods and discuss LCIA in relation to them. The article also presents how different frames and tools developed by the MADA community can be applied in conducting LCIAs. Although the exact framing of LCIA using decision analysis still merits debate, we show that the similarities between generic decision analysis steps and their LCIA counterparts are clear. Structuring of an assessment problem according to a value tree offers a basis for the definition of impact categories and classification. Value trees can thus be used to ensure that all relevant impact categories and interventions are taken into account in the appropriate manner. The similarities between multiattribute value theory (MAVT) and the current calculation rule applied in LCIA mean that techniques, knowledge, and experiences derived from MAVT can be applied to LCIA. For example, MAVT offers a general solution for the calculation of overall impact values and it can be applied to help discern sound from unsound approaches to value measurement, normalization, weighting, and aggregation in the LCIA model. In addition, the MAVT framework can assist in the methodological development of LCIA because of its well-established theoretical foundation. The relationship between MAVT and the current LCIA methodology does not preclude application of other MADA methods in the context of LCIA. A need exists to analyze the weaknesses and the strengths of different multiple-criteria decision analysis methods in order to identify those methods most appropriate for different LCIA applications.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010417661

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1162/10881980160084033


Related references

Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels. Environmental Science and Technology 43(6): 1718-1723, 2009

Decision analysis utilizing data from multiple life-cycle impact assessment methods Part I: A theoretical basis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8(1-2): 93-118, 2004

Decision analysis utilizing data from multiple life-cycle impact assessment methods Part II: Model development. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8(1-2): 119-141, 2004

Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. Environmental Science and Technology 45(12): 5068-5074, 2011

Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3): 282-285, 2008

A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment. Risk Analysis 36(2): 357-377, 2016

Informing Environmental Decision Making by Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3): 278-281, 2008

Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(7): 845-862, 2012

Uncertainty analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): case study on plant-protection products and implications for decision making. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(3): 184-192, 2005

Benefits and risks of emerging technologies: integrating life cycle assessment and decision analysis to assess lumber treatment alternatives. Environmental Science and Technology 48(19): 11543-11550, 2014

User needs analysis and development of priorities for life cycle impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(3): 153-160, 2004

Can Carbon Nanomaterials Improve CZTS Photovoltaic Devices? Evaluation of Performance and Impacts Using Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Decision Analysis. Risk Analysis 36(10): 1916-1935, 2016

Life cycle emission distributions within the economy: implications for life cycle impact assessment. Risk Analysis 22(5): 919-930, 2002

Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches. Environmental Science and Technology 40(4): 1104-1113, 2006

Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: a common policy research agenda. Risk Analysis 22(5): 879-894, 2002