+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of wearing aircrew protective clothing on physiological and cognitive responses under various ambient conditions

Effects of wearing aircrew protective clothing on physiological and cognitive responses under various ambient conditions

Ergonomics 46(8): 780-799

Heat stress can be a significant problem for pilots wearing protective clothing during flights, because they provide extra insulation which prevents evaporative heat loss. Heat stress can influence human cognitive activity, which might be critical in the flying situation, requiring efficient and error-free performance. This study investigated the effect of wearing protective clothing under various ambient conditions on physiological and cognitive performance. On several occasions, eight subjects were exposed for 3 h to three different environmental conditions; 0 degrees C at 80% RH, 23 degrees C at 63% RH and 40 degrees C at 19% RH. The subjects were equipped with thermistors, dressed as they normally do for flights (including helmet, two layers of underwear and an uninsulated survival suit). During three separate exposures the subjects carried out two cognitive performance tests (Vigilance test and DG test). Performance was scored as correct, incorrect, missed reaction and reaction time. Skin temperature, deep body temperature, heart rate, oxygen consumption, temperature and humidity inside the clothing, sweat loss, subjective sensation of temperature and thermal comfort were measured. Rises in rectal temperature, skin temperature, heart rate and body water loss indicated a high level of heat stress in the 40 degrees C ambient temperature condition in comparison with 0 degrees C and 23 degrees C. Performance of the DG test was unaffected by ambient temperature. However, the number of incorrect reactions in the Vigilance test was significantly higher at 40 degrees C than at 23 degrees C (p = 0.006) or 0 degrees C (p = 0.03). The effect on Vigilance performance correlated with changes in deep-body temperature, and this is in accordance with earlier studies that have demonstrated that cognitive performance is virtually unaffected unless environmental conditions are sufficient to change deep body temperature.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010568202

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12745979

DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000085644

Related references

Influence of hydration volume and ambient temperature on physiological responses while wearing CBRN protective clothing. Ergonomics 53(12): 1484-1499, 2011

The thermoneutral zone when wearing aircrew protective clothing. Journal of Thermal Biology 26(4-5): 419-425, 2001

The physiological responses of men wearing chemically impregnated protective clothing in a hot dry climate. Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory 1961: 1-8, 1961

Work tolerance and physiological responses to thermal environment wearing protective NBC clothing. Ergonomics 39(4): 620-633, 1996

Thermal responses and physiological strain in men wearing impermeable and semipermeable protective clothing in the cold. Ergonomics 40(2): 141-150, 1997

Psycho physiological strain caused by wearing the tropical combat protective clothing in operational nbc conditions. Travaux Scientifiques des Chercheurs du Service de Sante des Armees (12): 227-230, 1991

Physiological strains in hot-humid conditions while wearing disposable protective clothing commonly used by the asbestos removal industry. Ergonomics 36(10): 1241-1250, 1993

Influence of Hydration Volume and Ambient Temperature on Physiological Responses in Personal Protective Clothing. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 42: 801-802, 2010

Physiological problems associated with wearing NBC protective clothing during cold weather. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 71(2): 184-189, 2000

Physiological tolerance to work in a hot humid environment wearing protective clothing. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine 61(5): 480, 1990

Repeatability of physiological responses during two repeated protective clothing performance tests under identical test conditions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 44(5): 793-799, 2014

Sex-related differences in thermoregulatory responses while wearing protective clothing. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology 78(1): 28-37, 1998

Thermoregulatory responses of junior lifesavers wearing protective clothing. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 11(6): 542-548, 2007

The effects of metabolic work rate and ambient environment on physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive and chemical personal protective equipment. Biomed Research International 2015: 857536, 2015

Prediction of the physiological response of humans wearing protective clothing using a thermophysiological human simulator. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 10(4): 222-232, 2013