EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke



Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke



Stroke 31(8): 2004-2010



Background and Purpose: Assessment of quality of life (QOL) after stroke is becoming common with the recognition that evaluation of treatment should include quality as well as quantity of survival. This article will outline the main conceptual and methodological issues in QOL assessment, highlight advantages and disadvantages of measures used in stroke QOL research, and discuss some unresolved issues. Summary of Review: We undertook a MEDLINE search using the keywords "stroke" and "quality of life" and reviewed 3 key texts on QOL measurement in stroke. Fifteen generic and 10 condition-specific measures used to assess QOL in stroke were identified and evaluated with the following criteria: reliability, validity, responsiveness, precision, acceptability, suitability for proxy respondents, mode of administration, and use of patient-centered approaches in development. Domains covered and level of comprehensiveness varied widely between generic and stroke-specific measures. No stroke-specific instruments used patient-centered approaches in their development. Four stroke-specific measures (Frenchay Activities Index, Niemi QOL scale, Ferrans and Powers QOL Index-Stroke Version, and Stroke-Adapted Sickness Impact Profile (SA-SIP30)) provided evidence of reliability and validity. Conclusions: The need remains for a patient-centered, psychometrically robust, stroke-specific QOL measure. Patients should be involved in each stage of instrument development. Caution is needed in the selection of an instrument to measure QOL after stroke. Although the Ferrans and Powers QOL Index-Stroke Version, Niemi QOL scale, SA-SIP30, and Sickness Impact Profile come closest to satisfying many of the criteria outlined in this article, the selection of any individual instrument depends on the specific goals and constraints of a particular study.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010616760

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10926971

DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.31.8.2004



Related references

Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life in primary biliary cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology 34(Supplement 1): 190, April, 2001

Development and psychometric validation of measures to assess the impact of phenylketonuria and its dietary treatment on patients' and parents' quality of life: the phenylketonuria - quality of life (PKU-QOL) questionnaires. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 10(): 59-59, 2016

Post-stroke depression affects quality of life but not other stroke outcome measures. Stroke 30(1): 236, 1999

Which is more valid for stroke patients: generic or stroke-specific quality of life measures?. Neuroepidemiology 34(1): 8-12, 2010

Should quality of life measures be used to assess quality of care?. Anna Journal 19(1): 88-88, 1992

Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49(2): 381-394, 2006

Determinants of quality of life after stroke in China: the ChinaQUEST (QUality Evaluation of Stroke care and Treatment) study. Stroke 42(2): 433-438, 2011

The validity and sensitivity of three quality of life measures used to assess outcomes in epilepsy. Epilepsia 40(SUPPL 2): 213, 1999

Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83(12 Suppl 2): S4-S9, 2002

Quality-of-life measures in the evaluation of antihypertensive drug therapy: Reliability, validity, and quality-of-life domains. Clinical Therapeutics 18(6): 1276-1295, 1996

Evaluation of quality of life in clinical trials. Selecting quality-of-life measures. Controlled Clinical Trials 12(4 Suppl): 204s-216s, 1991

Extended ADL scales and quality of life measures in stroke. European Journal of Neurology 7(Supplement 3): 146, November, 2000

A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke. Pharmacoeconomics 19(2): 155-185, 2001

A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 28(11): 2155-2161, 1997