+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria



External validation of IASP diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and proposed research diagnostic criteria



Pain 81(1-2): 147-154



Recent work in our research consortium has raised internal validity concerns regarding the current IASP criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), suggesting problems with inadequate sensitivity and specificity. The current study explored the external validity of these IASP criteria for CRPS. A standardized evaluation of signs and symptoms of CRPS was conducted by study physicians in 117 patients meeting IASP criteria for CRPS, and 43 patients experiencing neuropathic pain with established non-CRPS etiology (e.g. diabetic neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia). Multiple discriminant function analyses were used to test the ability of the IASP diagnostic criteria and decision rules, as well as proposed research modifications of these criteria, to discriminate between CRPS patients and those experiencing non-CRPS neuropathic pain. Current IASP criteria and decision rules (e.g. signs or symptoms of edema, or color changes or sweating changes satisfy criterion 3) discriminated significantly between groups (P < 0.001). However, although sensitivity was quite high (0.98), specificity was poor (0.36), and a positive diagnosis of CRPS was likely to be correct in as few as 40% of cases. Empirically-based research modifications to the criteria, which are more comprehensive and require presence of signs and symptoms, were also tested. These modified criteria were also able to discriminate significantly, between the CRPS and non-CRPS groups (P < 0.001). A decision rule, requiring at least two sign categories and four symptom categories to be positive optimized diagnostic efficiency, with a diagnosis of CRPS likely to be accurate in up to 84% of cases, and a diagnosis of non-CRPS neuropathic pain likely to be accurate in up to 88% of cases. These results indicate that the current IASP criteria for CRPS have inadequate specificity and are likely to lead to overdiagnosis. Proposed modifications to these criteria substantially improve their external validity and merit further evaluation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010646982

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00011-1


Related references

Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain 150(2): 268-274, 2010

Factor analysis of signs and symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome A partial validation of IASP diagnostic criteria and suggestions for change. Neurology 50(4 Suppl. 4): A254, 1998

IASP diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome: a preliminary empirical validation study. International Association for the Study of Pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 14(1): 48-54, 1998

Complex regional pain syndrome: Are the IASP diagnostic criteria valid and sufficiently comprehensive?. Pain 83(2): 211-219, 1999

Proposed new diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Medicine 8(4): 326-331, 2007

Proposed New Diagnostic Criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain Medicine 10(3): 600-600, 2009

Validation of diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 48(3 Suppl. 2): A343, 1997

Analysis of patterns of three-phase bone scintigraphy for patients with complex regional pain syndrome diagnosed using the proposed research criteria (the 'Budapest Criteria'). British Journal of Anaesthesia 108(4): 655-661, 2012

Questions about new diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Medicine 10(3): 598-9; Author Reply 600, 2009

Modifying diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain 150(2): 217-218, 2010

Clinical reliability of diagnostic criteria in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Neurology 54(7 Supp 3): A177-A178, 2000

Complex regional pain syndrome (type 1): a comparison of 2 diagnostic criteria methods. Clinical Journal of Pain 24(7): 637-640, 2008

Complex regional pain syndrome type I: use of the International Association for the Study of Pain diagnostic criteria defined in 1994. Clinical Journal of Pain 18(4): 207-215, 2002

Diagnostic criteria in patients with complex regional pain syndrome assessed in an out-patient clinic. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 54(7): 894-899, 2010

Development of comprehensive diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome in the Japanese population. Pain 150(2): 243-249, 2010