+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Handheld metal detector localization of ingested metallic foreign bodies: accurate in any hands?



Handheld metal detector localization of ingested metallic foreign bodies: accurate in any hands?



Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 153(8): 853-857



Objective: To demonstrate the accuracy of handheld metal detectors (HHMDs) for identification and localization of ingested metallic foreign bodies when used by experienced and inexperienced investigators. Design: Prospective study comparing HHMD scanning with radiography. Setting and Patients: A consecutive sample of all eligible patients (N = 176) presenting to the emergency departments of Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Tex, and Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, Va, who were known or suspected to have ingested a metallic foreign body. Intervention: Each patient underwent HHMD scanning and radiographic evaluation. Main Outcome Measures: Statistical evaluation compared HHMD scanning with radiography and experienced vs inexperienced investigator HHMD scanning to determine the accuracy of the screening tool and investigators. Results: Experienced investigators performed HHMD scans on 140 subjects; inexperienced investigators scanned all subjects. Diseasewas defined as a foreign body in the esophagus on radiograph. The 3 experienced investigators demonstrated sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval (CI), 94%-100%), specificity of 92.4% (95% CI, 84.2%-97.2%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.9% (95% CI, 81.3%-96.6%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% (95% CI, 95.1%-100%); the proportion correct was 95.7% (95% CI, 90.8%-98.4%). The inexperienced investigators demonstrated sensitivity of 95.7% (95% CI, 88.0%-99.1%), specificity of 81.0% (95% CI, 72.1%-88.0%), PPV of 77.0% (95% CI, 66.8%-85.4%), and NPV of 96.6% (95% CI, 90.4%-99.3%); the proportion correct was 86.9% (95% CI, 80.9%-91.5%). The McNemar test demonstrated no statistically significant difference between HHMD scanning by experienced vs inexperienced investigators. Conclusions: Handheld metal detector scanning is an accurate, inexpensive, radiation-free screening tool and should be used for evaluation of patients suspected of ingesting coins and coinlike foreign bodies.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 010735016

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 10437760


Related references

Things that go beep: experience with an ED guideline for use of a handheld metal detector in the management of ingested non-hazardous metallic foreign bodies. Emergency Medicine Journal 23(6): 456-460, 2006

Use of a metal detector to identify ingested metallic foreign bodies. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 155(4): 803-804, 1990

The use of a metal detector to locate ingested metallic foreign bodies in children. Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine 13(5): 341-342, 1996

The use of a hand-held metal detector for localisation of ingested metallic foreign bodies - a critical investigation. European Journal of Pediatrics 163(4-5): 257-259, 2004

The utility of a handheld metal detector in detection and localization of pediatric metallic foreign body ingestion. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 92: 1-6, 2017

Identification and topographic localization of metallic foreign bodies by metal detector. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 39(8): 1245-1248, 2004

Just How Good Are Handheld Metal Detectors for Ingested Foreign Bodies?. Annals of Emergency Medicine 69(4): 516-518, 2017

Handheld Metal Detector for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Pediatric Emergency. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2018

Detection of ingested foreign bodies with a metal detector. Journal of Pediatrics 121(5 Pt 1): 837-838, 1992

Handheld metal detector confirmation of radiopaque foreign bodies in the esophagus. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery 127(11): 1371-1374, 2001

The utility of handheld metal detector in confirming metallic foreign body ingestion in the pediatric emergency department. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 21(2): 135-139, 2011

Hand-held metal detector identification of ingested foreign bodies. Pediatric Emergency Care 10(4): 204-207, 1994

A simple and inexpensive metal detector for magnetic and nonmagnetic metallic foreign bodies. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 72: 363-367, 1974

Causes and effects of metallic foreign bodies in wood. 1. 2. Metal detectors and their use. 3. Effects of metallic foreign bodies in the forest and in the major woodworking and wood processing industries. 4. Effects on the sale of logs containing foreign bodies and logs from which foreign bodies have been removed. Holz Zentralblatt 113(25; 32; 40; 43): 336; 457-458, 462; 565-566, 572; 620, 1987

Use of a commercially available metal detector for the localization of metallic foreign body ingestion in children. Journal of Otolaryngology 29(4): 218-220, 2000