EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
54,215,046
Abstracts:
30,230,908
PMIDs:
28,215,208
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals



Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals



Archives of Toxicology 74(12): 733-744, February



We validated a two-tiered murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) with a panel of standard contact (photo)allergens and (photo)irritants with the aim of improving the discrimination between contact (photo) allergenic potential and true skin (photo)irritation potential. We determined ear weights to correlate chemical-induced skin irritation with the ear-draining lymph node (LN) activation potential. During tier I LLNAs, a wide range of concentrations were applied on three consecutive days to the dorsum of both ears. Mice were exposed to UVA light immediately after topical application to determine the photoreactive potential of some test chemicals. Mice were killed 24 h after the last application to determine ear and LN weights and LN cell counts. It was possible to classify the tested chemicals into three groups according to their threshold concentrations for LN activation and skin irritation: (1) chemicals with a low LN activation potential and no or very low skin irritation potential; (2) chemicals with a marked LN activation potential higher than a distinct skin irritation potential; and (3) chemicals with LN activation potential equal to or lower than their skin irritation potential. Group 1 consisted only of contact allergens, indicating that LN activation in the absence of skin irritation points to a contact allergenic activity. Since groups 2 and 3 comprised irritants and contact allergens, a tier II LLNA protocol was used to finally differentiate between true irritants and contact allergens. Briefly, mice were pretreated with mildly to moderately irritating concentrations of the chemical to the shaved back and after 12 days were challenged on the ears as described above in order to elicit a contact allergenic response in the ear skin and the ear-draining LN. With this approach, tier II LLNAs have to be conducted only in cases for which skin irritation potential is in the range of LN activation potential and no structure-activity relationship data indicating a contact allergenic hazard are available.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 010874416

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11305775

DOI: 10.1007/s002040000192



Related references

A modified murine local lymph node assay for the differentiation of contact photoallergy from phototoxicity by analysis of cytokine expression in skin-draining lymph node cells. Toxicology. 125(2-3): 149-168,. 6, 1998

An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: 2nd round. Toxicology 212(1): 69-79, 2005

An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: first round. Toxicology 212(1): 60-68, 2005

Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology 69(2): 209-218, 1991

A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study. Archives of Toxicology 63(4): 274-282, 1989

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Production by Lymph Node Cells: An Alternative Endpoint for the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 3(4): 268-278, 1993

Influence of irritants on lymph node cell proliferation and the detection of contact sensitivity to metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis. 29(3): 128-132, 1993

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay: a Test Method for Assessing the Allergic Contact Dermatitis Potential of Chemicals/Compounds, report now available. Public Health Service. Federal Register 64(55): 14006-7, 1999

Evaluation of contact sensitivity of rubber chemicals using the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis. 28(2): 77-80, 1993

The local lymph node assay: An interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells. Journal of Applied Toxicology 14(4): 287-291, 1994

Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 2. The biological variability of the murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 80: 255-259, 2016

A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Archives of Toxicology 63(4): 274-282, 1989

Local lymph node assay with non-radioisotope alternative endpoints. Journal of Toxicological Sciences 27(3): 205-218, 2002

Murine local lymph node assay: an alternative test method for skin hypersensitivity testing. Lab Animal 31(7): 36-41, 2002

Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses. Toxicology 176(1-2): 123-134, July 1st, 2002