+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study



Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study



European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 23(4): 305-310



Purpose of investigation: Surgical treatment of endometrial cancer was traditionally done by laparotomy, however the laparoscopic approach has gained wider acceptance by gynecologic surgeons. The primary aim of the study was to report the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in a major group of patients with endometrial cancer. The second aim was to study the long-term results of laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Material and method: A prospective multicentric study was conducted at three oncolaparoscopic centres; 221 women who had undergone laparoscopic (177 women) or abdominal (44 women) hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy were included in the study. Women with stage IA, grade 1 did not undergo lymphadenectomy unless they had a high risk histologic tumor type. Lymph node dissection was performed in 145 women with disease greater than IA or grades other than 1. Results: The mean age and weight were similar in the compared laparoscopic and open groups. Perioperative blood loss was comparable in both groups (211.2 ml vs 245.7 ml, respectively) without any significant consecutive changes in serum hemoglobin values. Although the length of operating time for the laparoscopic surgery was significantly longer than the time for the laparotomy procedure (163.3 min vs 114.7 min, p<0.0001), the laparoscopic patients were discharged from hospital much earlier at 3.9 days (range 2-16) after the laparoscopic procedure compared with 7.3 days (range 5-16) after the abdominal procedure (p<0.0001). The difference in surgical complications between groups was statistically insignificant (p=0.58). Similar long-term results were noted in both groups. With a median follow-up of 33.6 months for the laparoscopy group and 45.2 months for the open group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence (p=0.99) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.86) between the two groups. Conclusion: The study illustrates that laparoscopically assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer is safe as an open procedure. The laparoscopic approach may also be considered for endometrial malignancy which typically occurs in obese and elderly, high-risk women. Our analysis showed no difference with respect to recurrence or survival between the compared laparoscopic and the open group.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 010909805

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12214729


Related references

Laparoscopic surgery of endometrial cancer. Preliminary results of a multicentric study. Gynaecological Endoscopy 8(5): 271-276, 1999

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for obese Korean women with endometrial cancer: long-term results at a single institution. Journal of Korean Medical Science 29(11): 1536-1543, 2014

The Oncologic Outcome and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Women with Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Results in Single Institution. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20(6): S60-S61, 2013

Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery for Obese Korean Women with Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Results Obtained at a Single Institution. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 20(6): S158-S159, 2013

Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 50(12): 902-909, 2015

Long-term survival outcome of laparoscopic staging surgery for endometrial cancer in Taiwanese experience. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 53(1): 57-61, 2014

Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Laparotomy in the Management of Early Endometrial Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 17(6): S172-S174, 2010

Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 200(3): 296.E1-9, 2009

Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic, open abdominal, and vaginal surgery for endometrial cancer in patients aged 80 years or older. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 24(5): 894-900, 2014

Laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer: state of art and long-term results. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 81(4): 265-8; Discussion 283, 2011

Long-term results of laparoscopic treatment of esophageal achalasia in children: a multicentric survey. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 23(11): 955-959, 2013

Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer. Surgery Today 44(7): 1266-1272, 2014

Long-term results after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians. Surgical Endoscopy 2019:, 2019

Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by a colon lifting-up technique that decreases the number of access ports: comparison by propensity scoring of short-term and long-term outcomes with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 22(1): 38-45, 2012

Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 112(2): 139-147, 2012