+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: Dosimetric comparison of common techniques



Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall: Dosimetric comparison of common techniques



International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 52(5): 1220-1230



Purpose: To compare seven techniques for irradiation of the postmastectomy chest wall (CW) using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) predictions for pneumonitis and ischemic heart disease and dose-volume histogram analyses for normal and target tissues. Methods and Materials: Plan comparisons were performed for 20 left-sided postmastectomy CW RT cases using target volumes based on clinical delineation of standard field borders. Seven common treatment techniques were planned for each case, using a prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the CW and internal mammary node (IMN) targets. NTCP model metrics were used to quantify the risks of pneumonitis and ischemic heart disease, supplemented by dose-volume metrics to assess the target coverage to the CW and IMNs, as well as normal tissue dose (lung and heart). Results: Overlap in the distributions of the CW mean dose for all plans was found, except cobalt, which was significantly less than the remaining techniques (global F test, F = 21.90, p < 0.0001). Standard tangents produced a significantly lower IMN mean dose than all other methods, as expected (F = 59.55, p < 0.0001); the reverse hockey stick and cobalt techniques were lower than the other methods, which were statistically similar. Cobalt produced a significantly higher percentage of the heart that received >30 Gy (V30) than the other methods (F = 49.76, p < 0.0001). Use of partially wide tangent fields (PWTFs) resulted in the smallest heart V30. Use of cobalt fields resulted in a significantly greater NTCP estimate for ischemic heart disease than all the remaining techniques (F = 70.39, p < 0.0001). Standard tangents resulted in a percentage of the lung receiving >20 Gy (V20) significantly less than with PWTFs, 30/70 and 20/80 photon/electron mix, and reverse hockey stick techniques. NTCP estimates for pneumonitis revealed significantly better results with standard tangents (F = 6.57, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: No one technique studied combines the best CW and IMN coverage with minimal lung and heart complication probabilities. The choice of technique should be based on clinical discretion and the technical expertise available to implement these complex plans. Of the seven techniques studied, this analysis supports PWTFs as the most appropriate balance of target coverage and normal tissue sparing when irradiating the CW and IMN.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 011174081

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11955732

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02760-2


Related references

Postmastectomy radiotherapy of the chest wall. Comparison of electron-rotation technique and common tangential photon fields. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 180(10): 629-636, 2004

Cardiac chamber and coronary artery doses associated with postmastectomy radiotherapy techniques to the chest wall and regional nodes. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 60(4): 1195-1203, 2004

Tangential beam IMRT versus tangential beam 3D-CRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a dosimetric comparison. Radiation Oncology 6: 26, 2011

Multivariate analysis of pulmonary fibrosis after electron beam irradiation for postmastectomy chest wall and regional lymphatics: Evidence for non-dosimetric factors. Radiotherapy & Oncology 57(1): 91-96, 2000

Is the chest wall irradiation obligatory for postmastectomy radiotherapy of breast cancer patients?. European Journal of Cancer 38(Suppl. 3): S155, 2002

Dosimetric and treatment planning considerations for radiotherapy of the chest wall. British Journal of Radiology 79(946): 828-836, 2006

Postmastectomy chest wall radiotherapy with single low-energy electron beam: An assessment of outcome and prognostic factors. Practical Radiation Oncology 2(2): 106-113, 2012

Dosimetric predictors of chest wall pain after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. RadioTherapy and Oncology 104(1): 23-27, 2012

Dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy on the left-sided chest wall and internal mammary nodes irradiation in treating post-mastectomy breast cancer. Radiology and Oncology 49(1): 91-98, 2015

Dosimetric comparison of three different involved nodal irradiation techniques for stage II Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and three-dimensional proton radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 75(4): 1173-1180, 2009

Lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR): dosimetric considerations for chest wall toxicity. British Journal of Radiology 89(1058): 20150628, 2016

Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques and standard wedged tangents for whole breast radiotherapy. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 53(1): 92-99, 2009

Evaluation of bolus electron conformal therapy compared with conventional techniques for the treatment of left chest wall postmastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Medical Dosimetry 38(4): 448-453, 2013